Quote (jspolice @ Feb 7 2024 05:58pm)
I said "by accident" because you assumed I wasn't applying the standard I applied to Tucker to other news media. But I did. Strange how you're now trying to defend their integrity, ignoring the basics and implicit recruitment and reporting biases of for-profit media.
I don't try to defend Tucker's integrity. I have never watched anything by him, believe it or not. I am vaguely aware of his name from the various online forums I am on.
Quote
Every Economics minor would be ashamed making such starry-eyed, idealistic assumptions.
Wow, crushing.
Quote
I said "premature" because you clearly didn't know my position and assumed I was a corporate media supporter. Neither of them are insults in the first place, and both are well justified, so please don't play victim now, I was nothing but fair and friendly to you.
Anyway, I just think that people like you try hard to convince me not to listen to anything Putin/Russia says. And you did not deny this.
Quote
You mean the bot who repeatedly ignored all of my arguments and rather repeated Russian state media talking points
I think for you to call them "talking points", you are putting a negative spin on it. You should have said something like, "Russia's perspective" or something neutral like that, it would have been less biased.
Also, you talk like having talking points is a bad thing that the Russia state does. But instead of "talking points", what do you think they should have? Every state wants to say something that frames their country in a good light, and I don't think this is propaganda. Most likely, everybody thinks what they are doing is the good thing, and this reflects in the kind of things they say about themselves. Very few people will talk bad about themselves because very few people think the thing they are engaged in is bad. So, given this, I don't know what you expect Russia to say. "We invaded Ukraine because we want to murder people!" Come on now.
Quote
and war excuses verbatim? You clearly did not get my point that there is no good faith discussion to be had with someone who isn't interested in challenging their own position or even engaging with arguments.
Why do you think InsaneBobb is not engaged in good faith discussion? I see that he sincerely believes in what he says. And he is certainly engaged with your arguments. His responses are always directly addressing your claims, they are just things that you disagree with. It sounds to me like you are frustrated that he doesn't immediately capitulate to your side so you accuse him of not being interested in being challenged.
Quote
The only reason you would take their side is because you happen to agree with him,
Naw. I don't take Bobb's side. The reason I even posted in this thread is because I saw gnarjay's garbage and felt compelled to respond.
I said Bobb has stomped you ...etc because I sensed that you couldn't counter his arguments and wanted an out.
Quote
not because you're having a principled issue. Try to be a better, more objective debater please, your bias is very thick.
Nah. I don't have any bias. I say this because I know very little about geopolitics. This whole Russia-Ukraine thing confuses me, to be honest. I don't have a "side". Both Russia and Ukraine are countries that I am very vaguely aware of and I would not know why they are fighting if it weren't for this thread, lol.