d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trump Barred From 2024 Colorado Ballot
Prev191011121384Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,377
Joined: Feb 5 2022
Gold: 2,200.11
Dec 20 2023 11:17am
Quote (ChatGPT @ Dec 20 2023 11:38am)
Those engines are not production ready, but now its GE yes.
+

Lockheed Martin uses the RD-180 engine for its Atlas V launch vehicle because of its proven performance, lower cost, and track record of success. The RD-180 is manufactured in Khimki, near Moscow, and delivered to the US by RD AMROSS, a joint venture of Pratt & Whitney and NPO Energomash.
In 2022, Elon Musk said that Boeing and Lockheed have relied on the Russian RD-180 engine. Musk also said that Lockheed Martin is hoping to move away from that in the future with engines from Blue Origin.


specifically the RD-180
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-180

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
On February 24, 2022, Russia began a large-scale military invasion of Ukraine. Six days later on March 2, 2022, as Russia continued the invasion, they announced an end of all sales and support of the RD-180 engines to the United States, in retaliation for sanctions placed on Russia by the US for the Ukraine attack.[29]


Ahh thanks for the info!
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 20 2023 11:18am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 20 2023 11:16am)
Proving Trump's direct responsibility for the storming of the Capitol isn't an open-and-shut case.


Damn if only we had him literally on video telling them to go to the capital, and knew he was calling senators during that time to pressure them to object, and knew he pressured his VP to not certify, and knew he had full knowledge the election wasn't stolen, and....

Wait it seems like we do fucking know he tried to do an insurrection and you're just being a piece of shit by pretending we don't.

Fuck dude, just use your brain for once instead of choking on Trump's hog.

The amendment in question has NEVER required a conviction, and in fact this is an open and shut case.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 20 2023 11:20am
Member
Posts: 23,444
Joined: Jun 30 2009
Gold: 167.53
Dec 20 2023 11:25am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 20 2023 12:18pm)
Damn if only we had him literally on video telling them to go to the capital, and knew he was calling senators during that time to pressure them to object, and knew he pressured his VP to not certify, and knew he had full knowledge the election wasn't stolen, and....

Wait it seems like we do fucking know he tried to do an insurrection and you're just being a piece of shit by pretending we don't.

Fuck dude, just use your brain for once instead of choking on Trump's hog.


My line of thinking is the same as yours. It is pretty straightforward in my perspective as well but I realized a while ago that people who favor Trump cannot objectively accept any fault from him unless there is some sort of direct line of evidence to his wrongdoing. When I mean direct, I think they expect photo/video evidence of him leading the insurrection in-person to be able to call that evidence (actually, I am not 100% sure if even this is enough because I think they will find a way to rationalize this as well). The crazy part is that he was forced by his secret service team to stand back when he tried to leave to lead the insurrection.

This post was edited by umeshieee on Dec 20 2023 11:27am
Member
Posts: 105,131
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Dec 20 2023 11:34am
Ahh... I see the Demo-delusionals have finally gotten out of bed. LOL

This post was edited by Ghot on Dec 20 2023 11:35am
Member
Posts: 54,107
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 20 2023 11:35am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 20 Dec 2023 18:18)
Damn if only we had him literally on video telling them to go to the capital, and knew he was calling senators during that time to pressure them to object, and knew he pressured his VP to not certify, and knew he had full knowledge the election wasn't stolen, and....

Wait it seems like we do fucking know he tried to do an insurrection and you're just being a piece of shit by pretending we don't.

Fuck dude, just use your brain for once instead of choking on Trump's hog.

The amendment in question has NEVER required a conviction, and in fact this is an open and shut case.

He told them to go to the Capitol, but he didn't tell them to storm it or use violence. Trump has often times rallied his supporters to the streets for demonstrations; you will have a hard time proving that he explicitly meant violent insurrection in this particular instance, rather than ordinary protest. Morally speaking, Trump is guilty as fuck. I'll happily admit that. But legally, his culpability for the actions of his supporters is not as clear.

Also, this argumentation by the anti-Trump side stings particularly against the backdrop of the Summer of Love in 2020 when plenty of Democratic politicians explicitly condoned the use of violence by demonstrators from their own side during the BLM protests, the attacks on the Portland courthouse and so on. If public calls to one's supporters to use violent protests and a breakdown of public order to further one's political goals constitutes an insurrection, then Pelosi, Waters et al. are guilty of it too.

My other points of course still stand: there is legal debate about whether section 3 of the 14th amendment actually applies to the presidency to begin with; and it is politically unfeasible to bar a candidate supported by nearly half the country from running without inflicting huge damage to the democratic process (if not even outright triggering a civil war).

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 20 2023 11:35am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 20 2023 11:36am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 20 2023 11:35am)
He told them to go to the Capitol, but he didn't tell them to storm it or use violence.


I don't need to go further. We know he knew they were armed.

You are just desparate to choke on Trump's hog. This is not a close call.
Member
Posts: 105,131
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Dec 20 2023 11:37am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 20 2023 12:35pm)
He told them to go to the Capitol, but he didn't tell them to storm it or use violence. Trump has often times rallied his supporters to the streets for demonstrations; you will have a hard time proving that he explicitly meant violent insurrection in this particular instance, rather than ordinary protest. Morally speaking, Trump is guilty as fuck. I'll happily admit that. But legally, his culpability for the actions of his supporters is not as clear.

Also, this interpretation by the anti-Trump side stings particularly against the backdrop of the Summer of Love in 2020 when plenty of Democratic politicians explicitly condoned the use of violence by demonstrators from their own side during the BLM protests, the attacks on the Portland courthouse and so on. If public calls to one's supporters to use violent protests and a breakdown of public order to further one's political goals constitutes an insurrection, then Pelosi, Waters et al. are guilty of it too.

My other points of course still stand: there is legal debate about whether section 3 of the 14th amendment actually applies to the presidency to begin with; and it is politically unfeasible to bar a candidate supported by nearly half the country from running without inflicting huge damage to the democratic process (if not even outright triggering a civil war).






There ya go again, confusing the issues with the facts. Democrats don't like facts. They don't even "see" facts.
They view the world through... shyt-colored-glasses. :D

This post was edited by Ghot on Dec 20 2023 11:39am
Member
Posts: 54,107
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 20 2023 11:42am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 20 Dec 2023 18:36)
I don't need to go further. We know he knew they were armed.

You are just desparate to choke on Trump's hog. This is not a close call.

Demonstrations by Republicans will always contain a fair share of armed people. By this standard, any Republican would be guilty of insurrection whenever any rally of his supporters gets out of hand.

And I'll ask again: are Pelosi and Waters guilt of insurrection too, since they condoned and encouraged the violent protests surrounding BLM in 2020? They knew many of the BLM protesters were armed, willing to carry out violence and dismantle public order when they told them to "not let up" and continue their protests. If not, what's the difference between Pelosi/Waters/BLM and Trump/Jan6?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 20 2023 11:47am
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Dec 20 2023 11:48am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 20 2023 05:42pm)
Demonstrations by Republicans will always contain a fair share of armed people. By this standard, any Republican would be guilty of insurrection whenever any rally of his supporters gets out of hand.

And I'll ask again: are Pelosi and Waters guilt of insurrection too, since they condoned and encouraged the violent protests surrounding BLM in 2020? They knew many of the BLM protesters were armed, willing to carry out violence and dismantle public order when they told them to "not let up" and continue their protests. If not, what's the difference between Pelosi/Waters/BLM and Trump/Jan6?


Were the BLM riots at capital hill? If not, probably that for starters.
Member
Posts: 47,069
Joined: Jun 6 2015
Gold: 40,597.67
Dec 20 2023 11:49am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Dec 20 2023 08:48am)
Were the BLM riots at capital hill? If not, probably that for starters.


BLM is also protesting something that actually takes place, such as racial injustice and inequality, not a fabricated event. The election was not stolen. Idk how they can’t see this.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev191011121384Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll