d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Lgb+f Vs T
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 20 2022 10:35pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Sep 20 2022 11:32pm)
Never understood the t being added, they can have very different goals.


The goal of them all is acceptance of non traditional identities
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 20 2022 10:46pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 20 2022 09:35pm)
The goal of them all is acceptance of non traditional identities


thats not the goal of all of them though, e.g. some gay people may just want acceptance of homosexual rights and not any and all identities
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 20 2022 10:47pm
Quote (El1te @ Sep 20 2022 11:46pm)
thats not the goal of all of them though, e.g. some gay people may just want acceptance of homosexual rights and not any and all identities


The goal of the lgbt movement has been acceptance of all identities. I don't care what an individual wants. They are not the movement as a whole.
Member
Posts: 50,826
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Sep 20 2022 10:48pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 20 2022 11:35pm)
The goal of them all is acceptance of non traditional identities


The goal at stonewall wasn't to fight for the rights of people who identify as gay, it was to fight for the rights of those who actually are. In a sane world, identity vs orientation wouldn't need a disclaimer, that's just a product of contemporary embrace of delusion. And even then, they were fighting for a narrower brand of identity, they sure weren't crusading for MAPs.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 20 2022 10:58pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 20 2022 09:47pm)
The goal of the lgbt movement has been acceptance of all identities. I don't care what an individual wants. They are not the movement as a whole.


I agree, the movement itself that is the goal, I'm just saying there are essentially "dissenters" within the group who may have thought otherwise when they first considered themselves in the movement
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 20 2022 11:00pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 20 2022 09:48pm)
The goal at stonewall wasn't to fight for the rights of people who identify as gay, it was to fight for the rights of those who actually are. In a sane world, identity vs orientation wouldn't need a disclaimer, that's just a product of contemporary embrace of delusion. And even then, they were fighting for a narrower brand of identity, they sure weren't crusading for MAPs.


He's kinda right that the movement as a whole has changed alot since stonewall, in a sense the people who believe it as orientation are being discredited by the idea of identity

This post was edited by El1te on Sep 20 2022 11:00pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 20 2022 11:10pm
Quote (El1te @ Sep 20 2022 11:58pm)
I agree, the movement itself that is the goal, I'm just saying there are essentially "dissenters" within the group who may have thought otherwise when they first considered themselves in the movement


Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 20 2022 11:48pm)
The goal at stonewall wasn't to fight for the rights of people who identify as gay, it was to fight for the rights of those who actually are. In a sane world, identity vs orientation wouldn't need a disclaimer, that's just a product of contemporary embrace of delusion. And even then, they were fighting for a narrower brand of identity, they sure weren't crusading for MAPs.


T has been in the movement for longer than I've even been aware if it. Who cares if it got more inclusive. You know what you call somebody who gets rights and then crusades against those rights being extended to others? An asshole. Sorry if going out if your way to be an asshole has consequences but that's just how it's always worked.

Blacks who fought against gay rights are in this camp as well.

As are women who fought against civil rights for blacks.
Member
Posts: 50,826
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Sep 20 2022 11:39pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 21 2022 12:10am)
T has been in the movement for longer than I've even been aware if it. Who cares if it got more inclusive. You know what you call somebody who gets rights and then crusades against those rights being extended to others? An asshole. Sorry if going out if your way to be an asshole has consequences but that's just how it's always worked.

Blacks who fought against gay rights are in this camp as well.

As are women who fought against civil rights for blacks.


So only assholes oppose extending the same acceptance to MAPs that the gay community earned? And the mapphobics deserve a beatdown at the hands of militant chomos?
All I see is specious reasoning. Each supposed civil rights movement needs to be judged on its merits, not claim a door was opened by all those who came before.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Sep 20 2022 11:57pm
I heard it was a TERF that threw the first brick at stonewall
Member
Posts: 47,083
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Sep 21 2022 12:00am
Why Does It Trigger You?
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85284514&f=119&o=410

lgbtq isnt about gay people any more

This post was edited by TiStuff on Sep 21 2022 12:01am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll