It is written law and documents such as the Constitution that are the only legitimate entities defining atural rights. The alternative is positive rights determined by man, in other words, tyranny. The whims of the powerful over the powerless.

This post was edited by Nibthebarb on Jan 29 2022 06:54pm

So if the constitution is revised to say we can kill you on the spot do you lose your right to life?

Yeah, sure, that's what it means.

Honest question, do you tie your own shoes? Worried about you.

Burn down the churches 🔥

It's the logical conclusion of what you said. Sorry if that makes you mad. You could also use it as a chance to clarify but you don't have the emotional control for that.

Sheets of paper make flimsy shields.

Yes, everyone who isn't you is "mad" and "doesn't know" things.

You haven't said anything else besides that since I started hangin' out here. Get some new material bud

This can't be serious. Are there actually people here that truly believe we should repeal the First Amendment?

What words/sayings would you suggest we criminalize? Can you provide examples of countries where doing so has benefited them in any measurable way?

Not an argument

Does your right to life come from a written constitution?

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jan 29 2022 09:45pm

LOL buy yourself a one way ticket to China and have a great time in paradise. You can then all form your own club over there and it will be the best thing for humanity