d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > How Far Would Democrats Go To Lock You Up?
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,858
Joined: Sep 29 2013
Gold: 1,804.12
Jan 18 2022 02:29am
Liberalism / Is / A / Mental / Disorder

I find it hilarious that some weirdo thinks execution is needed to protect them from a virus with a 99.87% survival rate

If that vax worked, why are you afraid ?

If that vax worked, why do you care about others being vaxxed?

If that vax worked, why do you need a second dose, third dose, booster shot, & according to Bill Gates a couple days ago, recommendation of annual boosters?

If that vax worked, why are you still wearing a mask?

If that vax worked, why are you still able to spread the disease?

Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Jan 18 2022 03:11am
Quote (WhiskeyRunz @ Jan 18 2022 08:29am)
Liberalism / Is / A / Mental / Disorder

I find it hilarious that some weirdo thinks execution is needed to protect them from a virus with a 99.87% survival rate

If that vax worked, why are you afraid ?

If that vax worked, why do you care about others being vaxxed?

If that vax worked, why do you need a second dose, third dose, booster shot, & according to Bill Gates a couple days ago, recommendation of annual boosters?

If that vax worked, why are you still wearing a mask?

If that vax worked, why are you still able to spread the disease?


apparently vaxxing doesn't work ^^
Member
Posts: 46,719
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Jan 18 2022 03:36am
Quote (SanduLungu @ Jan 18 2022 03:11am)
apparently vaxxing doesn't work ^^


Vaccines don't stop the omicron variant, and anyone who tests positive in China will be pulled from their home and loaded onto a bus to the concentration camps, vaccinated or not.

What's really telling is that there's been an inverse relationship between the effectiveness of authoritarian measures and the willingness to engage in them. A year ago during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were new and effective and could actually stop the variants killing many people, Joe Biden was elected on a campaign promising he would never issue a vaccine mandate and then refused to do so. When Omicron hits about as deadly as the common cold and vaccines are almost entirely ineffective at stopping the spread, Joe Biden issues his vaccine mandates and democrats are willing to follow them to the most bitter conclusions, even if it means sending storm troopers to rip children away from their parents and send people to camps and lock people up for free speech.
Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Jan 18 2022 03:39am
Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 18 2022 09:36am)
Vaccines don't stop the omicron variant, and anyone who tests positive in China will be pulled from their home and loaded onto a bus to the concentration camps, vaccinated or not.

What's really telling is that there's been an inverse relationship between the effectiveness of authoritarian measures and the willingness to engage in them. A year ago during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were new and effective and could actually stop the variants killing many people, Joe Biden was elected on a campaign promising he would never issue a vaccine mandate and then refused to do so. When Omicron hits about as deadly as the common cold and vaccines are almost entirely ineffective at stopping the spread, Joe Biden issues his vaccine mandates and democrats are willing to follow them to the most bitter conclusions, even if it means sending storm troopers to rip children away from their parents and send people to camps and lock people up for free speech.


omicron is milder than delta as well.
Member
Posts: 52,368
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jan 18 2022 03:55am
Quote (Goomshill @ 18 Jan 2022 10:36)
Vaccines don't stop the omicron variant, and anyone who tests positive in China will be pulled from their home and loaded onto a bus to the concentration camps, vaccinated or not.

What's really telling is that there's been an inverse relationship between the effectiveness of authoritarian measures and the willingness to engage in them. A year ago during the height of the pandemic when vaccines were new and effective and could actually stop the variants killing many people, Joe Biden was elected on a campaign promising he would never issue a vaccine mandate and then refused to do so. When Omicron hits about as deadly as the common cold and vaccines are almost entirely ineffective at stopping the spread, Joe Biden issues his vaccine mandates and democrats are willing to follow them to the most bitter conclusions, even if it means sending storm troopers to rip children away from their parents and send people to camps and lock people up for free speech.


To be fair to these politicians, the evolution of Sars-CoV-2 has really lured them into a trap. First, the Delta variant thwarts the promised "return to normalcy" after the (voluntary) vaccination campaign, then the ICUs started filling up again. At this point, it seemed to be the logical conclusion that a higher vaccination was needed to deal with a more aggressive, more deadly variant than previous strains. So establishment policitians all across the world felt like they had to go back on their word and support vaccine mandates and other strongarm tactics to increase vaccine uptake.

And just as they embraced these highly divisive and questionable policies, a new variant emerges which seems super scary at first and makes them double down on their new pro-coercion stance and adopt new, even more authoritarian measures. And then it turns out that this new variant, which seemed so scary during the first 1-2 weeks of its existence, is actually a wet fart and more or less just another flu, indicating the end of the pandemic rather than its climax.




So now politicians around the world are stuck between a rock and a hard place: the promise that there would be no vaccine mandates, no new restrictions for the vaccinated and so on and on have already been broken, whatever trust there still was has been lost, probably irrevocably. They've already turned all anti-vaccine folks into their eternal enemies, lost any respect of the vaccine-sceptics and pissed off the anti-lockdown crowd and the normies. If they now actually listened to the science and went back on their embrace of mandates and coercion, say by acknowledging that mandates are stupid for a variant where they don't stop transmission and cases are mild anyway, they would also lose the support of the covid hardliners and karens.

By losing their nerves during Delta, politicians have tied themselves to a policy which is destined to become more and more unpopular as time goes on. "They dun' fucked up."

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 18 2022 03:58am
Member
Posts: 7,638
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.00
Jan 18 2022 05:03am
From my perspective living in good old rural MN, the FED and State mandates were comical. The 'golden hammer' approach. If the goal was to reduce spread, have people mask, and equip hospitals, none of that happened. We had increased tourism on the North Shore as people wanted to 'get away' from the lockdowns from denser cities. Many of these people would be combative against sensible COVID measures requested in our small towns/bars. Imagine a badass biker gang acting like Karen's in a bar when the Sherriff has to tell them our town hospital has no beds for locals. Point is, the blanket golden hammer mandates were not great for a lot of jurisdictions and the political nature behind them was treasonous to the American people. Both Reds and Blues could have synchronized on COVID response rhetoric without the need for litigation or broad executive actions, instead we are down a path of lower trust society.
Member
Posts: 46,719
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Jan 18 2022 05:32am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 18 2022 03:55am)
So now politicians around the world are stuck between a rock and a hard place: the promise that there would be no vaccine mandates, no new restrictions for the vaccinated and so on and on have already been broken, whatever trust there still was has been lost, probably irrevocably. They've already turned all anti-vaccine folks into their eternal enemies, lost any respect of the vaccine-sceptics and pissed off the anti-lockdown crowd and the normies. If they now actually listened to the science and went back on their embrace of mandates and coercion, say by acknowledging that mandates are stupid for a variant where they don't stop transmission and cases are mild anyway, they would also lose the support of the covid hardliners and karens.

By losing their nerves during Delta, politicians have tied themselves to a policy which is destined to become more and more unpopular as time goes on. "They dun' fucked up."


That's the part where the narrative goes off the rails though. Its like you say, there was a promise of return to normalcy, a reluctance to embrace the authoritarian measures during election season. But when the virus turned out to be a wet fart, it set the stage for them to put more slack in the leash and dial back the increasingly unpopular restrictions and sort out their supply chain crisis and return to normalcy like promised. But they didn't. That's the part where we plunged headlong into the draconian stage of authoritarianism and democrats started embracing the policies of the CCP at its worst. I don't see why losing their nerves on delta locked democrats into this death spiral, they could have reacted to the good news about Omicron ending in SA with almost zero deaths and spreading like mad in NYC with no death uptick and said oh, its time to capture the messaging and take a victory lap and reclaim the popular grounds we campaigned on.
I can't even see this as the self-interested actions of rational actors. This isn't good politics. Biden and the democrats are crashing and burning hard. A radical fringe of the country might embrace this message, but look at the big picture of those poll results- its scary how many fringe democrats support authoritarianism, but the vast majority of Americans don't, and the more radical it becomes, the more alienating it becomes. Once it starts becoming rhetoric of taking away your children and putting you into concentration camps, even the radical democrats start getting cold feet and questioning their fanaticism. There's no self-serving interest in pursuing this lunacy.

Quote (RedFromWinter @ Jan 18 2022 05:03am)
From my perspective living in good old rural MN, the FED and State mandates were comical. The 'golden hammer' approach. If the goal was to reduce spread, have people mask, and equip hospitals, none of that happened. We had increased tourism on the North Shore as people wanted to 'get away' from the lockdowns from denser cities. Many of these people would be combative against sensible COVID measures requested in our small towns/bars. Imagine a badass biker gang acting like Karen's in a bar when the Sherriff has to tell them our town hospital has no beds for locals. Point is, the blanket golden hammer mandates were not great for a lot of jurisdictions and the political nature behind them was treasonous to the American people. Both Reds and Blues could have synchronized on COVID response rhetoric without the need for litigation or broad executive actions, instead we are down a path of lower trust society.


More specifically to MN, and why we had those billboards with Walz literally sticking his head up his own ass along the freeways, is that there was a glaring metropolitan bias in the measures adopted by the governor. The first year of the pandemic was a bunch of lockdown measures without any concern for localization or different degrees of application to urban vs rural, yet crafted to exempt stuff favorable to the cities. He shut down bars and restaurants state-wide except for take-out orders, even when rural minnesota had basically zero cases of covid and it was almost entirely geographically clustered in the cities. But rural restaurants can't survive on take-out like the cities can. I remember I got Pho from Quang on Nicollet on Christmas last year and there was a line of people wrapped around inside the building, spreading their germs in close contact. Totally fine to be standing clustered together indoors under Walz's order. But Keith Ellison sued to shut down Shady's Restaurants in the northland when nobody was at risk of catching Covid there. People in the cities were already congregating as large crowds with covid spreading like wildfire before they mobbed up and burned the cities down, and at that point it was obvious nobody was ever going to enforce the mandates in downtown, only weaponized against republican districts.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 18 2022 05:46am
Interesting and deplorable how fart right anti-everything are about to destroy their own country that needs solid policies and discipline against potential pandemics (which can be provoked by hostile foreign powers).
Member
Posts: 22,559
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,785.13
Warn: 30%
Jan 18 2022 05:52am
Which of you is gonna come make me?
Trained, prepared and ready.
Come get some.
Member
Posts: 20,179
Joined: Sep 21 2006
Gold: 67,069.69
Trader: Trusted
Jan 18 2022 06:20am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 18 Jan 2022 01:40)
Anything less than execution for the unvaccinated (unless they have a valid medical reason) is not far enough.


Are you being facetious? Please tell me you are.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll