d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Military - Class Action Suit Filed
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 208Replies: 14Track Topic
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
#11
Oct 19 2021 08:53am
Quote (xJukEx @ 19 Oct 2021 14:34)
My commander in Chief says other wise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycaUzZ4tDqA

Check out the polls ;)


You means "LOSERS AND SUCKERS" ?
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
#12
Oct 19 2021 09:42am
Quote (xJukEx @ Oct 19 2021 10:34am)
My commander in Chief says other wise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycaUzZ4tDqA

Check out the polls ;)


Pretty sure trump lost in 2020

That's why he's protesting outside instead of working inside
Member
Posts: 26,862
Joined: Feb 27 2013
Gold: 4,445.68
#13
Oct 19 2021 10:03am
Quote (xJukEx @ Oct 19 2021 07:34am)
My commander in Chief says other wise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycaUzZ4tDqA

Check out the polls ;)


Oh lawd
Just waiting on the ol "Haha the left has TDS REEEEEEEEE" rhetoric now :bonk:
Member
Posts: 3,712
Joined: Mar 15 2021
Gold: 5.00
#14
Oct 19 2021 10:15am
Enlisted men may have any and all constitutional rights suspended if it is deemed a military necessity

https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/285/goldman-v-weinberger

Disobedience of a direct order is grounds for dishonorable discharge.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#15
Oct 19 2021 11:26am
Quote (Doggyfood @ Oct 19 2021 11:15am)
Enlisted men may have any and all constitutional rights suspended if it is deemed a military necessity

https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/285/goldman-v-weinberger

Disobedience of a direct order is grounds for dishonorable discharge.


The order has to be a lawful order, but yes, this is otherwise correct.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact