Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 23 2021 11:46pm)
JBP goes right into every assumption of the book and tears it apart.
ie: Why would anyone assume a society ruled by the proletariat would stop being corrupt? Especially after using violence to get there.
He exposes it as the satanic inversion of morality that it is - by showing how the book ignores its own assumptions by appealing to the readers thirst for power.
Will to Power, not thirst, which is the highest human drive probably, overcoming even the pleasure principle. Will to logos is a biggin too.
Is Peterson pretending this isn't a fundamental psychological principle? I'll have to see I guess. Busy actually doing things lol. This stuff is for twenty somethings and Peterson is too grown for this stuff.
This post was edited by Skinned on Apr 24 2021 11:14am