So what you're saying is we should make it illegal to watch your own kids and the government should take over child raising so the parents can work.

I gotta say, I agree. I didn't expect you to have such a reasonable position.

Wow

I personally advocate for a much higher estate tax upon death but almost certainly those with significant wealth would just domacile elsewhere.

because stay at home moms shouldnt get the same pay as at work moms. maybe pay them less in a tax credit, i guess they can still have something.

"Suffering and exploitation" is an odd way to look at individuals engaging in mutually beneficial arrangements. The amount wealth someone has is often a reflection of how hard members of their family have worked to improve the standard of living for members of the household. We're all the same in that regard and some are better at it than others.

Doing great at the stupid today, Thor. Well done!

I'm 100% for dual parent households where one parent stays home and cares for hearth, home, and family, and the other is the "provider". However, from an economic standpoint, it's better if both parents play provider, and professionals raise the children en masse . Therefore, to incentivize the economically superior option, you provide tax credits to those willing to leave the raising of their children to strangers. Those who choose the "nuclear family" option take on the personal responsibility of the financial burden. And the single mothers that account for 90% of all welfare payments can simply get fucked. They want to spread their legs, it's their problem. When their children starve because they're too irresponsible to care for them, toss them in jail for child abuse, take the kids away, and stop incentivizing stupid.

This idea of "make it illegal to raise your own kids" is pure trash that only some fat atheist marxist would ever even consider. Make your bed, clean your room, shave, take a fucking shower, get some exercise, and stop trying to one-up everything long enough to attract a mate, maybe you'll gain some basic understanding of what the fuck personal responsibility and children actually mean. Making children is a choice. Grow the fuck up enough to make it responsibly, or shut the fuck up about taking away everyone else's shit in support of it.



Disagree entirely. They should get nothing. If they don't want to be a stay at home mom, we can incentivize them to work and hand care over to professionals. If they want to be a stay at home mom, then they can focus on themselves with no help at all. If they can't be responsible enough to make either option work? They need to sew their fucking legs shut and stop expecting society to pay for their sex life.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 10 2021 02:02pm

so so so so so so much this.

my wife's bane is stay at home parents. they're a special needs factory.

Providing an incentive to one is the same as providing a disincentive to the other. Your position is to punish parents who want to spend time with their kids. It's big government molly coddling of families who can't fend for themselves. Believe it or not, there are things to consider besides economics, and part of that is having families raised by families, not by big government funded day cares like you want.

Single parent stay at home are cancer. Dual parent households with a stay at home? Mixed bag, honestly. Some work out incredibly well, others are just cum factories/dumpsters who're a drain on everyone and everything around them. All depends on the specific person you're referring to. Gen X'ers have gone half way to convincing me that stay at home parents are a curse though. Helicopter parents are so disjointed with reality that they're worse for society than homeless children. Seriously, leave the little shit alone long enough that they can skin their knee, eat dirt, and goose a stranger. People aren't born perfect, we learn from mistakes. Your child is not special, they're a fucking child. Let them grow the same way you did or gtfo.



This is false. A negative consequence is not the same as positive reinforcement. You are not disincentivizing stay at home parents by not providing tax credits. You simply aren't rewarding their choice. I have at no point advocated for punishing people for raising their own children. Only marxist monsters are that authoritarian.



Nobody said shit about "government run" anything. Stop shitposting, the level of duh has surpassed anything even remotely reasonable. Where in "professional" does the word "government" exist? Seriously, use your head.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 10 2021 02:11pm

Factually incorrect. Single parents staying at home are good for society. It is inherently better for parents to raise their kids than to send them to a government run daycare.