d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > 8 Levels Of Whiteness
Prev123417Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 18 2021 07:39pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ 19 Feb 2021 02:37)
A 9, my ancestors owned people.


like shapiro owning libtards all day long?
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Feb 18 2021 07:46pm
I'd probably rate myself a 4.5.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 18 2021 07:51pm
I am for the abolition of Sapiro eyebrows
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Feb 18 2021 07:52pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 19 Feb 2021 08:19)
"White benefit": "wont speak up against whiteness in solidarity while in public, benefits from whiteness (some POC are in this category as well)"
In the good old times, militant blacks and the woke brigade used a different term for this category: "Uncle Tom".



I guess I fall into category 3.
Ain't no motherfucker taking my white privilege away from me. :angry:


lmao :lol:

people of color not judging strangers based on race..is now “white privilege”
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 18 2021 07:58pm
Quote (excellence @ 19 Feb 2021 02:52)
lmao :lol:

people of color not judging strangers based on race..is now “white privilege”


Civil rights activists in the 1960s: "Judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin."
""Civil rights activists"" in the 2010s: "Nah, fuck that. Race-based quotas it is!"
Member
Posts: 129,918
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 17,050.69
Feb 18 2021 08:08pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 18 2021 08:58pm)
Civil rights activists in the 1960s: "Judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin."
""Civil rights activists"" in the 2010s: "Nah, fuck that. Race-based quotas it is!"


america, what a great thing it is and how far we have come. it makes people saucemane and fenderp get all rustled in their jimmies, they just cant control themselves.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2021 08:17pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 18 2021 07:58pm)
Civil rights activists in the 1960s: "Judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin."
""Civil rights activists"" in the 2010s: "Nah, fuck that. Race-based quotas it is!"


Unfortunately when you pretend to be color blind it blinds you to the actions of people who aren't and makes it impossible to correct them.

Someday we might be able to take the "see no color" approach, but we aren't anywhere near a place where that's practical yet.
Member
Posts: 129,918
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 17,050.69
Feb 18 2021 08:19pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 18 2021 09:17pm)
Unfortunately when you pretend to be color blind it blinds you to the actions of people who aren't and makes it impossible to correct them.

Someday we might be able to take the "see no color" approach, but we aren't anywhere near a place where that's practical yet.


you're disgusting
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2021 08:21pm
Quote (Duckling @ Feb 18 2021 08:19pm)
you're disgusting


And you're a mall cop
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 18 2021 08:46pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 19 Feb 2021 03:17)
Unfortunately when you pretend to be color blind it blinds you to the actions of people who aren't and makes it impossible to correct them.

Someday we might be able to take the "see no color" approach, but we aren't anywhere near a place where that's practical yet.


"To create a fair society, liberals must counter the racism on the right with (anti-white) racism of their own" - is that the argument you're making?

Imho, this approach just isnt the path to a fairer, more equal society. Instead, it leads to a bizarro world where saying "abolish blacks" is considered a hate crime which gets you fired or even into prison, while saying "abolish whites" gets you into high school textbooks. Or where studious Asian kids get penalized in school admission because they outperform black and hispanic kids, and this discrimination is then justified by the notion that these Asians, despite coming from an equally underprivileged background, have some sort of comparative advantage because they purportedly suffer less racist abuse at the hands of the white ruling class in their 90% nonwhite Brooklyn/Queens/Bronx district...


Anyway... at the end of the day, I still believe that the Bernie 2016 playbook is the most promising and least divisive way of reducing racial inequality: let society invest more into poor communities, pursue policies which give low income earners a larger share of the pie - these efforts will automatically benefit PoC more than whites (and thus reduce racial inequality) as long as PoC are disproportionately affected by poverty. This approach is far less toxic than if you funnel money into some sort of "black equalizing fund" while letting poor white/hispanic/asian communities languish.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 18 2021 08:48pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123417Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll