Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 10:41pm)

Really? So it's acceptable to bomb someone based on an unsourced allegation?

Perhaps you should reconsider that position.

Quote (EndlessSky @ 2 Feb 2021 19:54)

I knew this would be the initial sub-70 IQ counter argument of the bottom dwellers.

10 members of the SPLC resigned over the past few years because lawsuits are bankrupting the organization.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 09:41pm)

Really? So it's acceptable to bomb someone based on an unsourced allegation?

Perhaps you should reconsider that position.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 07:25pm)

Is that what he said? See, narratives are a wonderful thing. How do you avoid defamation lawsuits related to misquoting people? Don't misquote them:



See what's quoted? “We don’t advocate Christians to go out and be vigilantes, we want the government to do it.”

I don't know if the context of what he said had anything to do with what they claim it does. The alleged statement isn't sourced or cited.

Regardless, he did NOT attack anyone, no other member of the church attacked or harmed anyone. Bombing a church because you don't like their message is not "self defense" it's terrorism.

I mean, plenty of Mosques have had Imams actively preach going out and killing gays. Such as the Mosque the Pulse Nightclub Shooter attended. Direct result of a direct call to violence. Would it now be okay to bomb that mosque? Or is it maybe more accurate to say if people are inciting violence, that's criminal activity, and they need to be arrested, rather than terrorizing whole congregations?

Quote (Thor123422 @ 2 Feb 2021 20:20)

There you go, assuming that you know everything.

We've talked about this guy about a dozen times on this forum. He's a disgusting person who regularly advocates government violence.

Quote (Handcuffs @ 2 Feb 2021 20:25)

It's pre-emptive. They wish to expand a message of violence that will likely become enacted upon once they have the necessary means and force. Doesn't seem to make sense to allow people to collect the power needed to kill you just because they haven't killed you yet.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 10:27pm)

Bombs are illegal. Bombing a building, regardless of the reason, is a crime. If the purpose of the crime is to cause terror to achieve a political end, the bombing is classed as terrorism.

If this guy actually said what is claimed, there should be video. Where is it? "Everyone's got a phone". Regardless, if he actively incites violence, then legal means can be used to deal with it.

Your post is nothing more than a flagrant support of violent terrorism.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 10:27pm)

"I think you're going to do bad things to me, so I'll get even first" is not a valid defense for terrorism.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 08:27pm)

"I think you're going to do bad things to me, so I'll get even first" is not a valid defense for terrorism.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 2 Feb 2021 20:29)

I don't really care what's legal in this case.

I believe violence is permissible when used against people or groups that advocate for violence or death of others based on attributes beyond their control.

It's that simple.

Quote (Handcuffs @ 2 Feb 2021 20:30)

Why not? If I believe InsaneBobb should be killed and want to gather supporters of this cause, then you believe you should have to wait until we actually kill you (or attempt to) before you can do anything?

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 2 2021 08:31pm)

Then you are inciting criminal violence, and simply reporting you to authorities with proof is enough.

Bombing buildings is never "self-defense". Bombs and their use are 100% illegal for civilian use. You're simply excusing terrorism.