d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Conservatives And Coal
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,996
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 2 2021 02:41pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Feb 2 2021 02:37pm)
These arguments are difficult to have because there are so many factors involved in power generation.

Typically a coal plant is designed to last 30-50 years and so you have to divide the whole of the benefit by the number of years and the initial cost. Solar panels have a much shorter lifespan and create tons of heavy metal poisons that are very difficult to remove from the environment. The only reason we can use Chinese-manufactured solar is because China doesn't care about human rights in their country.

Then there is dispensability, which Solar obviously fails at. California saw rolling blackouts during the summer which is something that shouldn't happen in first world countries.

Then there is power loss as a result of transforming power. 10% of energy is lost when transferred to or from a battery which severely decreases the efficiency of solar.

If you don't believe that Solar is more expensive, just look at the disparate power costs of California VS other states. California's power costs are 50% higher but they still experience blackouts. Solar also receives billions in subsidies, so that argument is semi weak. Energy generation is a scientific field that leftists love because similar to healthcare there are so many factors involved. It is easy to simply look at operational costs while ignoring all other factors to come up with a conclusion that is utter bullshit.

https://jancovici.com/en/energy-transition/electricity/what-is-the-true-cost-of-electricity/


some good points but energy usage doesnt work like that. blackouts cant be attributed simply to source of power. the more energy u require the more problematic it becomes. cali prob uses 10x more energy than states we'd even compare it to that are coal powered. and 10x more power isn't 10x as problematic, its 100x more.

in any case until we have a revolution of storage in batteries solar will still remain problematic.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Feb 2 2021 02:43pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Feb 2 2021 12:54pm)
Coal is a superior energy source to wind and solar by every metric.


Quote (theCrossbones @ Feb 2 2021 01:17pm)
false


Id be interested in a deep dive on this
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 2 2021 03:12pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 2 2021 02:41pm)
some good points but energy usage doesnt work like that. blackouts cant be attributed simply to source of power. the more energy u require the more problematic it becomes. cali prob uses 10x more energy than states we'd even compare it to that are coal powered. and 10x more power isn't 10x as problematic, its 100x more.

in any case until we have a revolution of storage in batteries solar will still remain problematic.


Solar as a sole source will indeed remain problematic, but there are other ways to generate baseline power.

Quote (duffman316 @ Feb 2 2021 02:43pm)
Id be interested in a deep dive on this


For one, the efficiency of solar has grown like gangbusters in the past 10 years, and with a dramatic drop in the price of panels as economies of scale and more efficient manufacturing practices are implemented it just makes it even better.

In terms of watts / dollar a solar panel is better than coal even with coal having the modern grid practically designed around it.

Any of the issues like metals or pollution during production you can attribute to solar panels you can attribute 10x to coal. This argument is parroted by know-nothings who don't realize coal is incredibly polluting even when you ignore CO2.

You don't really need a deep dive into the subject now. Maybe 10 years ago, but not now. The tech for solar, wind, etc. has become better than coal in almost every way. There's a reason why Texas leads the nation in wind energy despite producing a ton of gas, coal, and oil in their back yard. It's cheap by comparison

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 2 2021 03:13pm
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Feb 2 2021 03:19pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 2 2021 04:12pm)
Solar as a sole source will indeed remain problematic, but there are other ways to generate baseline power.



For one, the efficiency of solar has grown like gangbusters in the past 10 years, and with a dramatic drop in the price of panels as economies of scale and more efficient manufacturing practices are implemented it just makes it even better.

In terms of watts / dollar a solar panel is better than coal even with coal having the modern grid practically designed around it.

Any of the issues like metals or pollution during production you can attribute to solar panels you can attribute 10x to coal. This argument is parroted by know-nothings who don't realize coal is incredibly polluting even when you ignore CO2.

You don't really need a deep dive into the subject now. Maybe 10 years ago, but not now. The tech for solar, wind, etc. has become better than coal in almost every way. There's a reason why Texas leads the nation in wind energy despite producing a ton of gas, coal, and oil in their back yard. It's cheap by comparison


What pollutants does coal create? Modern coal just emits CO2 and hot water basically.

The sulfur and trace toxins are removed IE: Clauss Process

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Feb 2 2021 03:19pm
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Feb 2 2021 03:25pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Feb 3 2021 07:19am)
What pollutants does coal create? Modern coal just emits CO2 and hot water basically.

The sulfur and trace toxins are removed IE: Clauss Process


What planet is this on?
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Feb 2 2021 04:58pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 2 2021 04:25pm)
What planet is this on?


You have a background in oil.

What do you think about pollution?
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 2 2021 05:05pm
Coal generates 20% of US electricity. There are not enough functional nuclear power plants or green power sources to replace coal. The only other method to replace the power gained from coal is Natural Gas, which is a far greener resource, however, any push to increase production of natural gas is blocked. So there we are.

Also, if you're a fan of steel, you're a fan of coal. There's no such thing as a "steel mine". Steel is an alloy requiring coking coal to produce.

The overall reason why coal is "great" is because we have some 300-400 years worth of reserves at current consumption rates. As we transition more into natural gas and "green" power sources, and coal mining is refocused almost exclusively around Steel production (meaning most of the coal is exported to China), and China gains more and more sources of Coal imports, Coal could be a backup power source in case of emergency pretty much forever.

There's a lot of great things about coal. But it's definitely not the power source of the future. The current power source of the future is Natural Gas.
Member
Posts: 16,257
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Feb 2 2021 05:43pm
there is a device that uses dems in a wheel like a hamster. Mounted with a monitor that at any time you want to increase power output displays varying degrees of trump talking

i run all my devices on it, fantastic buy

This post was edited by addone on Feb 2 2021 05:43pm
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Feb 2 2021 06:06pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Feb 3 2021 08:58am)
You have a background in oil.

What do you think about pollution?


I think we are better off looking at ways to clean the pollution than drastically changing anything in a knee jerk reaction, coal will go when the market rules it out as a viable option and that's coming sooner or later.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Feb 2 2021 06:14pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 2 2021 03:41pm)
some good points but energy usage doesnt work like that. blackouts cant be attributed simply to source of power. the more energy u require the more problematic it becomes. cali prob uses 10x more energy than states we'd even compare it to that are coal powered. and 10x more power isn't 10x as problematic, its 100x more.

in any case until we have a revolution of storage in batteries solar will still remain problematic.


Holy shit...

I just looked this up for serious and the answer is far more pathetic than I could have imagined.

California shut off their power grid to prevent forest fires during high wind weather.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll