d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Pard Moral Decision Making
Prev12348Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 52,256
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Gold: 110.20
Jan 4 2021 10:02pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jan 4 2021 08:01pm)
I think they should have a failsafe in place for brake failure and should not approach crossings at high speed.


Some small amount of failure will always be inevitable and there should be a procedure in place for when such a scenario occurs.
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Jan 4 2021 10:02pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jan 4 2021 08:01pm)
Id program it to hit the brakes and try not to hit anyone

But to answer the question, I wouldn't program it to discriminate based on age, no.

Programming a car to intentionally swerve into someone (because they are old) is premeditated murder and the maker of the program should be held liable


I hear you. What about in this specific scenario in which the brakes have failed? What do you think the self-driving car should do?

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Jan 4 2021 10:02pm
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jan 4 2021 10:04pm
Quote (Nathan @ Jan 5 2021 03:02pm)
Some small amount of failure will always be inevitable and there should be a procedure in place for when such a scenario occurs.


If the car has the technology to tell a boomer and a child apart and make a decision based on that we will be too busy fighting the machines to worry about this kind of question.
Member
Posts: 52,256
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Gold: 110.20
Jan 4 2021 10:05pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jan 4 2021 08:04pm)
If the car has the technology to tell a boomer and a child apart and make a decision based on that we will be too busy fighting the machines to worry about this kind of question.


They already do, and we aren't.
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jan 4 2021 10:06pm
Quote (Nathan @ Jan 5 2021 03:05pm)
They already do, and we aren't.


Yet...
Member
Posts: 9,499
Joined: Feb 3 2005
Gold: 6,969.69
Warn: 20%
Jan 4 2021 10:18pm
From an insurance stand point you hit the child but I think it should take out the elderly.

Hopefully they’ve lived a long and full life, the child is just beginning their misery.

e/ or perhaps stay the course and save the child from a life of misery???

This post was edited by DrFaGgIt on Jan 4 2021 10:18pm
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Jan 4 2021 10:19pm
Quote (DrFaGgIt @ Jan 4 2021 08:18pm)
From an insurance stand point you hit the child but I think it should take out the elderly.

Hopefully they’ve lived a long and full life, the child is just beginning their misery.


So you think age trumps adhering to a social contract (crossing on red or green)?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 4 2021 10:22pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 4 2021 10:46pm)
Friends of PaRD, the classic Trolley Dilemma has become of interest to self-driving car makers as they attempt to refine their algorithms for extreme (yet still plausible) scenarios. ^Nathan and I went through the scenarios that they have on MIT's https://www.moralmachine.net/, which you can 'play' to help them get human data on moral decisions. It will also allow you to see stats on your own decisions compared to the average of all other users.

The scenarios there revolve around the self-driving car having a brake failure and needing to decide to either stay on current course or swerve, with potentially lethal consequences being associated with either outcome. Here is one scenario (poll related) that ^Nathan and I viewed differently:

https://i.imgur.com/O5R0ACH.png

The two options become:

1. The car stays on current course and hits the child who is crossing when he is not supposed to be in the crosswalk.
2. The car swerves and fatally hits the elderly man who is crossing when he is supposed/allowed to be in the crosswalk.

What do you think the self-driving car should do? Are there scenarios from the game that would make decision-making more complex for you? For instance, the other scenarios you can play also include aspects of gender, social status, health, animals v. humans, and the number of people in either outcome as points of influence.

You can also use the 'design' feature on https://www.moralmachine.net/ to create your own scenario (as I have down with the photo above) to see what other PaRD members would do.


Pull the e-brake, drift between, and splatter them both.

Member
Posts: 9,499
Joined: Feb 3 2005
Gold: 6,969.69
Warn: 20%
Jan 4 2021 10:23pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 4 2021 06:19pm)
So you think age trumps adhering to a social contract (crossing on red or green)?



It’s really hard to say. When you put it like that my knee-jerk is “No!” But as I said earlier the child is just beginning their life and you can only hope the elderly person has had a good one. They are on their way out and the child is just in.

I think in a human driven car the answer is that the old man dies because you would probably see the child in front of you first and react based on that, seeing the old man a moment too late.

So no I don’t think it trumps the social contract but I think it is less morally reprehensible to kill the elderly if this is your choice to make.

This post was edited by DrFaGgIt on Jan 4 2021 10:27pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 4 2021 11:13pm
While the life of a child is likely more valuable than that of an old person, I think I'd kill the child. Brake failure is a single point of failure in this scenario whereas swerving could be interpreted as multiple points of failure. It may seem silly, but many people would interpret the swerving action as an algorithm failure which leads to distrust of the system.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12348Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll