Quote (Plaguefear @ 27 Dec 2020 09:57)
Nope, there is no difference between a fish hook and a spiky fish or redclaw, in fact the live fish is much more likely to do serious damage.
interesting, where did you learn that 'fact'? any actual evidence to support that, or just more baseless claims?
Quote (Plaguefear @ 27 Dec 2020 09:57)
Its a single tiny hole, and most catch and release anglers myself included use barbless hooks, you are being overly dramatic.
is that so? what percentage roughly is 'most' here, and what do you base that claim on? anecdotal evidence of you and the anglers you know? sales stats of different hook types? angler magazine surveys? genuine question, i don't know enough about it to judge if it's true or not, i'm just suspicious because some of your other claims were clearly... influenced by personal bias.
Quote (Plaguefear @ 27 Dec 2020 09:57)
Even your garbage smithsonian article states that the science is still disputed heavily on both sides.
what exactly makes the article 'garbage'? the fact that it contradicts your claim that fish definitely don't feel pain, or do you simply have a better source that irrefutably proves your position? because i'd gladly educate myself if it's scientifically sound. i'd actually prefer if you were right, so please, show me the real stuff.
Quote (Plaguefear @ 27 Dec 2020 09:57)
I watched a friend accidently hook a pike by its eye and throw it back, 10 minutes later he caught the same eyeless pike, it can't have been in too much pain if it was still aggressively feeding.
i watched a football player break their neck and play on for another 40 minutes. i watched a man get stabbed in the head and calmly walk through the streets as if nothing happened - so obviously humans can't feel pain, and a little stabbing will surely do no serious harm to them if you just don't use serrated knives...
again, from what i can tell, this probably does not do enough damage to justify an outright ban. i'm clearly not a principled animal rights activist or a vegan or anything along those lines. i'm against unnecessary cruelty and i'd prefer if animals didn't suffer needlessly, but i don't fundamentally question our omnivorous diet, or the realities about food mass production, even though i support the regulation and moderation of some of the most damaging (to climate, eco systems, and animal wellbeing) forms of exploitation.
what i radically oppose, however, is obvious self-deception and bullshittery, silly rationalisations and blatant science-denial - i genuinely prefer an honest scumbag over someone trying to insult my and their own intelligence so cheaply.