d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Rittenhouse's Crazy Qanon Lawyer - Lin Wood
Prev123411Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 21 2020 08:24pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Nov 21 2020 09:20pm)
What part of taking a gun and going out of your way to antagonise a mob is part of your non aggression principle?
News flash, if that moron didn't show up rocking maga gear and carrying a gun no one ends up dead.


Ah yes its his fault that his presence angered some lunatic who attacked him.
Classic victim blaming.

Existing near deranged violent leftists and open carrying aren't violations of the non aggression principle. Why would they be?
libertarians generally promote and defend the right to bear arms.

Video evidence indicates the attackers violated the NAP and he defended himself.
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Nov 21 2020 08:27pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 22 2020 01:24pm)
Ah yes its his fault that his presence angered some lunatic who attacked him.
Classic victim blaming.

Existing near deranged violent leftists and open carrying aren't violations of the non aggression principle. Why would they be?
libertarians generally promote and defend the right to bear arms.

Video evidence indicates the attackers violated the NAP and he defended himself.


So the non aggression principle is fine with antagonising people? Then it doesn't exist and you might as well just admit your entire viewset is built on bullshit.
Showing up at a blm rally in maga gear IS an act of aggression, its a direct challenge that will certainly be answered, if you are ok with this and not ok with the consequences then you are a hypocrite.

By your logic i can walk into a police station wearing a "Fuck pigs" tshirt and shoot any cop who comes at me in "self defence".

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Nov 21 2020 08:29pm
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 21 2020 08:29pm
For people with any grip on reality, what is more likely?

A ) People are supporting a kid who they reasonably believe defended himself and was subsequently demonized, smeared and imprisoned
or
B ) People are supporting actual murder and bailed him out even though they think he is guilty

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Nov 21 2020 08:29pm
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2020 08:31pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 22 Nov 2020 02:29)
For people with any grip on reality, what is more likely?

A ) People are supporting a kid who they reasonably believe defended himself and was subsequently demonized, smeared and imprisoned
or
B ) People are supporting actual murder and bailed him out even though they think he is guilty


The only two possible options. Oh no. A dichotomy. We are trapped.

Unless...

e/ I can't believe this website still doesn't have a thonk emote. It's like the fucking dark ages round here.

This post was edited by MxVivianWulf on Nov 21 2020 08:32pm
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 21 2020 08:43pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Nov 21 2020 09:27pm)
So the non aggression principle is fine with antagonising people? Then it doesn't exist and you might as well just admit your entire viewset is built on bullshit.
Showing up at a blm rally in maga gear IS an act of aggression, its a direct challenge that will certainly be answered, if you are ok with this and not ok with the consequences then you are a hypocrite.

By your logic i can walk into a police station wearing a "Fuck pigs" tshirt and shoot any cop who comes at me in "self defence".


You have shown time and again you don't understand and can't grasp even the basics but you insist it must all be 'bullshit'.
Do you see the problem there?

No, showing up in MAGA gear is not an act of aggression. Its a first amendment protected right.
It does not at all justify physically attacking and trying to kill that person.
Its also a poor analogy or representation of what happened in Kenosha that night.

"BLM" and rioters don't own the state of Wisconsin.

This is the 'evidence' of Kyle 'antagonizing' people and supposedly deserving to be attacked by a child rapist:

Quote
Two eyewitnesses interviewed by Wisconsin Right Now say Rosenbaum was enraged because Rittenhouse, and others, were using fire extinguishers to put out an arson fire in a dumpster that Rosenbaum, and others, were trying to push toward police squad cars.

They also believe that Rosenbaum may have been determined to rob Rittenhouse because the teenager seemed like the “weak” member of the herd and had walked off by himself. They think this because they say Rosenbaum, 36, “intricately” tied his shirt around his face, they believed to conceal his identity. Whether that would have been the case is obviously an unknown, but it was their perception.

The two eyewitnesses, Justice and Dylan Putnam, were willing to put their names to it. Videos also back up pieces of what they told us. There’s video of Rittenhouse with the fire extinguisher, video of Rosenbaum pushing the burning dumpster, and, of course, video of Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse down and cornering him behind a car before Rittenhouse opened fire.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2020 08:45pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 22 Nov 2020 02:43)
You have shown time and again you don't understand and can't grasp even the basics but you insist it must all be 'bullshit'.
Do you see the problem there?

No, showing up in MAGA gear is not an act of aggression. Its a first amendment protected right.
It does not at all justify physically attacking and trying to kill that person.
Its also a poor analogy or representation of what happened in Kenosha that night.

"BLM" and rioters don't own the state of Wisconsin.

This is the 'evidence' of Kyle 'antagonizing' people and supposedly deserving to be attacked by a child rapist:


Such reliable source. Such brilliant journalism.
Including speculation without clarification is propaganda not news.
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 21 2020 08:46pm
Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Nov 21 2020 07:12pm)
Kid was 17 and was groomed by his dumbfuck 'Blue Lives Matter' mom. He made some real dumb decisions but he is also a minor.


I dont care. We put down dogs that bite people. Put a bullet in the back of this adult head (hes 17, not 15 so that age sympathy bullshit doesn't fly here). When I was 17 I was working two jobs and a full time college student. I was able to obtain student loans. I had a signed lease. I was an adult.

He knew what he was doing and he understood the consequences of his actions. Hes has no learning disability. He can go fuck himself or better yet his soon to be white supremacist pals will.be fucking him
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 21 2020 08:46pm
Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Nov 21 2020 09:31pm)
The only two possible options. Oh no. A dichotomy. We are trapped.

Unless...

e/ I can't believe this website still doesn't have a thonk emote. It's like the fucking dark ages round here.


I posed a simple question contrasting the two given narratives to illustrate a point.
People are defending him and bailed him out because they believe he is not guilty, not because they love murder.

I never said they are the only two possible options.
Feel free to share whatever delusion the commies have come up with.

Can you answer the question tho?
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2020 08:47pm
Quote (MizzouFTW @ 22 Nov 2020 02:46)
I dont care. We put down dogs that bite people. Put a bullet in the back of this adult head (hes 17, not 15 so that age sympathy bullshit doesn't fly here). When I was 17 I was working two jobs and a full time college student. I was able to obtain student loans. I had a signed lease. I was an adult.

He knew what he was doing and he understood the consequences of his actions. Hes has no learning disability. He can go fuck himself or better yet his soon to be white supremacist pals will.be fucking him


Sorry that's just not how I see things. I understand the vengeful impulse but I think we also have to recognise the environment this kid was brought up in.



This post was edited by MxVivianWulf on Nov 21 2020 08:52pm
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 21 2020 08:48pm
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Nov 21 2020 09:46pm)
I dont care. We put down dogs that bite people. Put a bullet in the back of this adult head (hes 17, not 15 so that age sympathy bullshit doesn't fly here). When I was 17 I was working two jobs and a full time college student. I was able to obtain student loans. I had a signed lease. I was an adult.

He knew what he was doing and he understood the consequences of his actions. Hes has no learning disability. He can go fuck himself or better yet his soon to be white supremacist pals will.be fucking him


Decent human beings don't put down children who defend themselves against child rapists.
Nor do they fantasize about kids killing themselves.

There is no equivalent here to a dog that bit someone.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123411Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll