d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Degradation - Democrats Should Not Be Surprised
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 6,544
Joined: Jan 17 2010
Gold: 3.33
Nov 18 2020 04:01pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Nov 18 2020 04:28pm)
"crackpot authoritarian measure a leftist came up with while smoking pot with their Leninist buddies"

vs

"orange-fuck-yourself"

Let me think twice who should dare to open it.



I don’t like Trump. I am a Christian not a Trumpist. I view authoritarian leftism as a greater threat to God’s people, but I will say the video on 9/11 was appalling. I’d like to see the full context of the call, but on face value it was extremely lacking in basic human empathy. God says not to put your faith in men, they always fail you.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Nov 18 2020 04:10pm
Quote (FGdumpster @ Nov 18 2020 04:19pm)
I see so many Democrats complaining about the rapid degradation of public discourse. They fail to realize that they have been the principal catalyst. Calling your fellow American citizens sexist, racist, xenophobic, fascist, “actual” nazis, etc isn’t something people used to do back when people spoke to each other with basic dignity.

Just because people would rather keep their freedoms than go along with some crackpot authoritarian measure a leftist came up with while smoking pot with their Leninist buddies, doesn’t make them a ___insert horrible label___. Despite all the self-righteous pandering, their language amounts to nothing more than constant insult and violent innuendo. So, please don’t claim you were blind sided; or you could keep lying.


Trump
Dignity

Pick one
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 18 2020 04:30pm
ah yes, the good old "don't be mean to racists, otherwise you're an equally bad person" narrative...

it's funny how badly the right abuses the word "freedom", particularly to justify bigotry of all sorts...
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 18 2020 04:50pm
Quote (FGdumpster @ Nov 18 2020 04:19pm)
I see so many Democrats complaining about the rapid degradation of public discourse. They fail to realize that they have been the principal catalyst. Calling your fellow American citizens sexist, racist, xenophobic, fascist, “actual” nazis, etc isn’t something people used to do back when people spoke to each other with basic dignity.

Just because people would rather keep their freedoms than go along with some crackpot authoritarian measure a leftist came up with while smoking pot with their Leninist buddies, doesn’t make them a ___insert horrible label___. Despite all the self-righteous pandering, their language amounts to nothing more than constant insult and violent innuendo. So, please don’t claim you were blind sided; or you could keep lying.


You can believe what you want, the problem is that social conservatives codify the laws to suit their morals. There shouldn't be a debate about whether or not trans-people should be able to use public bathrooms as they feel comfortable, but Group A wants to meet with people from Group B to make laws about Group C without their input or consent.

If social conservatives didn't make miscegenation laws then people might not think social conservatism is racist in nature, one of many examples to choose from.

Notice how nobody has outed conservatives who aren't racial in their beliefs, an example being George Will, a conservative who is principled and believes in low taxes and limited government. It is the conservatives that have followed the King Birther that have embraced White Identity Politics who are being called what they resemble. There is an old saying...if the shoe fits. George Bush, a Christian and someone who believes that god loves all people hasn't been called a racist or fascist, for anything he has done that the left has hated, even trying to oppress gay couples with the federal government through DOMA (another example of a Group A and a Group B making laws to hurt Group C without consent, input, or consultation from Group C) because it was done with respects to Christianity.

The conservatives who want the police to have the right to kill blacks with no accountability, check Hispanics for papers and lock em up, wanna put the gays back in their place, etc, are actually what people say they are.

Again nobody is calling principled conservatives racist and fascist. Plenty of conservatives have come through this unscathed, and then there are other conservatives who believe black lives don't matter, and they are making themselves heard.

The price for these people not being in the closet is being labeled appropriately :/

Trust me, if the GOP was about low taxes and limited government I might vote for them at this point. I pay a staggering amount of taxes now :(

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 18 2020 04:51pm
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Nov 18 2020 04:54pm
Wait so we’re not supposed to call people who are racists nationalists fascists and Nazis racist nationalists fascists and Nazis?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 18 2020 05:08pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 18 2020 04:50pm)
You can believe what you want, the problem is that social conservatives codify the laws to suit their morals. There shouldn't be a debate about whether or not trans-people should be able to use public bathrooms as they feel comfortable, but Group A wants to meet with people from Group B to make laws about Group C without their input or consent.

If social conservatives didn't make miscegenation laws then people might not think social conservatism is racist in nature, one of many examples to choose from.

Notice how nobody has outed conservatives who aren't racial in their beliefs, an example being George Will, a conservative who is principled and believes in low taxes and limited government. It is the conservatives that have followed the King Birther that have embraced White Identity Politics who are being called what they resemble. There is an old saying...if the shoe fits. George Bush, a Christian and someone who believes that god loves all people hasn't been called a racist or fascist, for anything he has done that the left has hated, even trying to oppress gay couples with the federal government through DOMA (another example of a Group A and a Group B making laws to hurt Group C without consent, input, or consultation from Group C) because it was done with respects to Christianity.

The conservatives who want the police to have the right to kill blacks with no accountability, check Hispanics for papers and lock em up, wanna put the gays back in their place, etc, are actually what people say they are.

Again nobody is calling principled conservatives racist and fascist. Plenty of conservatives have come through this unscathed, and then there are other conservatives who believe black lives don't matter, and they are making themselves heard.

The price for these people not being in the closet is being labeled appropriately :/

Trust me, if the GOP was about low taxes and limited government I might vote for them at this point. I pay a staggering amount of taxes now :(


Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Nov 18 2020 05:08pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Nov 18 2020 02:54pm)
Wait so we’re not supposed to call people who are racists nationalists fascists and Nazis racist nationalists fascists and Nazis?


call me chinese, call me chinaman, just don't call me late for bat soup.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 18 2020 05:09pm
Op do u consider those who support 1st trimester abortions immoral murderers?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 18 2020 05:09pm
Member
Posts: 6,544
Joined: Jan 17 2010
Gold: 3.33
Nov 18 2020 05:14pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Nov 18 2020 05:10pm)
Trump
Dignity

Pick one



Dignity. This isn’t about Trump. Although he is a temporal symptom of the larger necrosis.

Quote (Skinned @ Nov 18 2020 05:50pm)
You can believe what you want, the problem is that social conservatives codify the laws to suit their morals. There shouldn't be a debate about whether or not trans-people should be able to use public bathrooms as they feel comfortable, but Group A wants to meet with people from Group B to make laws about Group C without their input or consent.

If social conservatives didn't make miscegenation laws then people might not think social conservatism is racist in nature, one of many examples to choose from.

Notice how nobody has outed conservatives who aren't racial in their beliefs, an example being George Will, a conservative who is principled and believes in low taxes and limited government. It is the conservatives that have followed the King Birther that have embraced White Identity Politics who are being called what they resemble. There is an old saying...if the shoe fits. George Bush, a Christian and someone who believes that god loves all people hasn't been called a racist or fascist, for anything he has done that the left has hated, even trying to oppress gay couples with the federal government through DOMA (another example of a Group A and a Group B making laws to hurt Group C without consent, input, or consultation from Group C) because it was done with respects to Christianity.

The conservatives who want the police to have the right to kill blacks with no accountability, check Hispanics for papers and lock em up, wanna put the gays back in their place, etc, are actually what people say they are.

Again nobody is calling principled conservatives racist and fascist. Plenty of conservatives have come through this unscathed, and then there are other conservatives who believe black lives don't matter, and they are making themselves heard.

The price for these people not being in the closet is being labeled appropriately :/

Trust me, if the GOP was about low taxes and limited government I might vote for them at this point. I pay a staggering amount of taxes now :(



I just don’t know a single conservative that meets that description in my personal life. And until I see them everywhere, I have to consider your contention a strawman. While it’s true that the people for limited government have no voice anymore, that’s largely a result of gross financial mismanagement, which makes big government a permanent fixture, and entrenched vote buying, i.e. multi-generational recipients of checks that arrive by mail that will never vote against their own handout. Furthermore, most conservatives I know support police and criminal justice reforms, in the form of increased funding for much, much more training.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll