d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Swamp Demons Want Term Limits For Supreme Court
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,343
Joined: Jan 23 2007
Gold: 752.10
Sep 25 2020 06:01am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 25 2020 12:00am)
Seems the opposite, imo.

After having the ACA shoved down our throats, along with any number of other... Interesting power plays by the Obama Administration, the other side got the power, and has been using it relatively light-handedly by comparison.

It's like the right was hit in the head by a baseball bat, and in response the right bitch slapped the left. If you wish to use moronic metaphors, at least use correct ones.

The left gets power, they use it. Consistently. The right gets power, they mostly sit on it and spin. That you can point at a whole 3 times in 12 years that the right has chosen to exercise the power the majority grants them? Cry us a fucking river.

Note: I'd love term limits. The worst activist Senators of the left would be gone. Finally.


What has Obamacare done to you? My premiums are ridiculously low with a minimal out of pocket max.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 25 2020 07:31am
Quote (EndlessSky @ 25 Sep 2020 07:02)
I support term limits for SCOTUS. 15 years is more than enough for anyone in power.

Although i see it in the near future as an issue. You need POTUS and Senate to have the same party so there could be situations in which SCOTUS vacancies are left open for years on end. 20-25 years may actually be needed for stability reasons.

25 years is fine i can agree there. Congress needs shorter limits (imo 6 terms for Reps, and 2 terms for Senate so 12 years each) as well

Quote (thundercock @ 25 Sep 2020 01:49)
This is a waste of time because it would require a constitutional amendment. Don't want the courts to be political? Vote yes if the ABA gives them a unanimous "well-qualified." If they don't have that, grill them a bit and if they provide satisfactory answers, confirm them.

of course, its just funny to see such ridiculous grandstanding by swamp demons who have been in politics longer than the term limits they’re attempting to impose on the Judiciary branch!!
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 25 2020 08:11am
Quote (thundercock @ Sep 25 2020 12:49am)
This is a waste of time because it would require a constitutional amendment. Don't want the courts to be political? Vote yes if the ABA gives them a unanimous "well-qualified." If they don't have that, grill them a bit and if they provide satisfactory answers, confirm them.


by far my biggest gripe with 2020 politics, people suggesting shit we can't just make happen on desire or even majority alone.

that said senate/house reps should have a 3-4 term limit.

and SCOTUS judges should get 30 year limits. it would have caused RBG to step down earlier.

from a logic standpoint when the SCOTUS life term limits were created life was shorter. i realize that the intent was to make them more apolitical, but still.
Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Mar 16 2018
Gold: 336.86
Sep 25 2020 08:18am
So someone getting a haircut is a fair way to judge them on their abilities to govern?
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Sep 25 2020 08:24am



The main reason SCOTUS justices get in for life is so they WON'T be political. They won't HAVE to fight to keep their jobs. They won't be able to be bought off.

Both the Supreme Court and the Electoral College were/are excellent ideas. The only time anyone complains is when their "evil megalomaniac plans" get disrupted.
This ofc is why the Supreme Court and the Electoral College ARE the way they are... to prevent "evil megalomaniacs" from pulling off their evil plots.










This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 25 2020 08:28am
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 25 2020 08:25am
Quote (IroningTheMaiden @ Sep 25 2020 09:18am)
So someone getting a haircut is a fair way to judge them on their abilities to govern?


depends on the haircut.
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Sep 25 2020 08:28am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 25 2020 12:00am)
Seems the opposite, imo.

After having the ACA shoved down our throats, along with any number of other... Interesting power plays by the Obama Administration, the other side got the power, and has been using it relatively light-handedly by comparison.

It's like the right was hit in the head by a baseball bat, and in response the right bitch slapped the left. If you wish to use moronic metaphors, at least use correct ones.

The left gets power, they use it. Consistently. The right gets power, they mostly sit on it and spin. That you can point at a whole 3 times in 12 years that the right has chosen to exercise the power the majority grants them? Cry us a fucking river.

Note: I'd love term limits. The worst activist Senators of the left would be gone. Finally.


Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 25 2020 12:12am)
This is just garbage. At least try to stick to the facts.

Senators are limited to 2 per state specifically to prevent activism by the most populace states from harming everyone else. House members are elected so they have populace-based representation.

The senate is how it is specifically so there's a barrier from the House enacting laws that completely destroy some states for the benefit of others. Likewise, the EC exists, as opposed to a popular vote for president so that again, a few states do not destroy the rest due to population counts.

Part of the reason so many Bills never get voted on by the Senate is specifically because their earmarked so full of garbage by activist representatives from New York and California that they're actively harmful to every other state.

For constantly pretending to be so knowledgeable, all you've shown tonight is that you simply don't care about the how's or why's or inherent balance of the US Government. All you want is your own way. Which is probably why you support rioters. If you can't get your own way, why not just burn it down?


Thor bamboozled once again
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Sep 25 2020 08:31am
I don't know if I support term limits for SCOTUS but I sure af do for Congress
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Sep 25 2020 08:33am
Quote (nobrow @ Sep 25 2020 05:01am)
What has Obamacare done to you? My premiums are ridiculously low with a minimal out of pocket max.


I lost my insurance plans, and my price per month to cover myself and my wife went from $190/month to $460/month, and that's an employer plan.

Compliant plans crushed a good thing. I'm not 70 years old. I don't have time to go to the doctor every other day if I stub a toe. The likelihood I'm going to go to the doctor is so low that if I'm dying, we may not know until it's too late.

The ACA prices people like me out of the market, because people like me have neither the time nor the spare cash for it to be worth any alleged benefit.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 25 2020 08:36am
Like Reid in 2013, if you can't get your way on something change the long standing rules for short term gratification.

Dumb reactionary proposal that's so obviously partisan.

Like most are saying, I think the general populace would overwhelmingly welcome term limits on House of Reps the SCOTUS however needs to either have very long term limits or no limits at all. 18 Years is too short for a limit IMO.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll