This seems to be a theme in your posts. I smack you and instead of admitting fault and moving on you insist the other person is triggered or making attacks.

Its why I've been asking if English is your first language, theres a significant communication barrier here and I'm not sure if it's just that you are a lazy thinker or if you genuinely don't understand

I'm damn sure the climate has changed compared to when I was a kid. Only real solution will be if people stop having kids for a good long time cuz there's simply too many of us sucking the juices out of our planet.

All other "solutions" are not real solutions no matter how hard this is politically weaponized and pushed by the left.

My 2 cents right there

no no you're right. I should have just understood what he "meant" rather than analyzing the words he actually used

This is only a realistic interpretation if you are totally ignorant of the subject

So in your opinion, the GND would have prevented this years forest fires? Got it

Let's be positive: we won't make it and everything will be lost for ever.
Not to mention: Climate change is a communist tool. Ask Crambovenzi, he dodge the subject EVERY TIME.

Nope, still not actually reading

Bernie is making a direct comparison. The costs of the GND against the costs involved in this fire. A direct comparison cannot be made between the two.

Bernie's post lacks context. If this were a Trump tweet, it would already have 5 Pinocchios.

I didn't even think of that but it's so true.

Except he isn't comparing the cost of these events, he's making a point about the increased frequency, which is clear because he's referencing things that are all happening at once that have never happened at once, and in the case of the artic topping 100 degrees something that's literally never happened.

You guys are making a lot of assumptions about the content (that it's intended as a direct cause-effect relationship) which are debunked by a basic understanding of the science and the content of the tweet itself, and ignoring essential context in that these are all happening at once meaning it's a statement about the frequency.

This is the problem with conservatism in America, you guys can't make honest criticism about these things. Instead of having a discussion that accept we need to do something and we need to figure out the details, you guys are making obviously dishonest criticisms about how the issue is presented in tweets, or going out of your way to not read the GND and parroting propaganda instead.



You need to do some introspection on why you are adding so many assumptions to the statements of everybody you talk to.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 20 2020 12:40pm