Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 15 2020 10:14pm)
Bail is a privilege. Usually the amount is large enough that the accused complies and comes back to court to recoup that large dollar amount.
Removing that mechanism will just result in court non compliance and honestly damage the justice system. You’ll end up with people not coming back because they’ve got nothing to lose.
It’s not about rich and poor it’s a necessary mechanism. Not surprised Thor doesn’t understand the mechanics though and why it’s a necessity. I’m sure he has some better idea for court compliance.
Holding every accused person without bail is not the solution. Letting everybody go without bail is not the solution either.
In our current system bail is about being rich and poor.
I love how you have to insult me instead of interact with what I actually posted though. Easier to pretend the other person is dumb when you just avoid what they say and strawman them into the ground.
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 15 2020 09:59pm)
even the world's stretchiest rubber band doesnt stretch that far. "if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you". access to justice is not an issue.
even if it were the case that someone needed that income to afford a lawyer, they still wouldnt be able to afford as much for one as someone more wealthy. so what? thats the advantage of being wealthy. you can buy expensive clothes and you can hire expensive lawyers. anyone who cant afford one will be provided with one. if you think the public defender is inadequate or incompetent, then sue them for malpractice.
letting criminals go free to commit more crimes should not be an option.
Please do some basic research on the quality of our public defender system. It's absolutely abysmal in this country.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 15 2020 09:40pm