d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Bail Reform
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,908
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 15 2020 09:26pm
Well your typical criminal in minneapolis has ~10 felony convictions with stayed sentenced, all time spent free on bail without seeing a day in jail or prison, and then gets arrested for some other violent felony and gets released immediately for the 11th time
Pretty much escalates that way up until they murder someone, and then they either get caught and finally see prison or they get away with it
but otherwise basically zero criminal justice system to be had
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 15 2020 09:31pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 15 2020 11:14pm)
Bail is a privilege. Usually the amount is large enough that the accused complies and comes back to court to recoup that large dollar amount.

Removing that mechanism will just result in court non compliance and honestly damage the justice system. You’ll end up with people not coming back because they’ve got nothing to lose.

It’s not about rich and poor it’s a necessary mechanism. Not surprised Thor doesn’t understand the mechanics though and why it’s a necessity. I’m sure he has some better idea for court compliance.


thats what theyve done in ny, and its proved a failure. im proposing doing away with bail in the opposite direction - dont let them out at all. no worry about them coming back if theyre not out.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 15 2020 09:40pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 15 2020 10:14pm)
Bail is a privilege. Usually the amount is large enough that the accused complies and comes back to court to recoup that large dollar amount.

Removing that mechanism will just result in court non compliance and honestly damage the justice system. You’ll end up with people not coming back because they’ve got nothing to lose.

It’s not about rich and poor it’s a necessary mechanism. Not surprised Thor doesn’t understand the mechanics though and why it’s a necessity. I’m sure he has some better idea for court compliance.


Holding every accused person without bail is not the solution. Letting everybody go without bail is not the solution either.

In our current system bail is about being rich and poor.

I love how you have to insult me instead of interact with what I actually posted though. Easier to pretend the other person is dumb when you just avoid what they say and strawman them into the ground.

Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 15 2020 09:59pm)
even the world's stretchiest rubber band doesnt stretch that far. "if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you". access to justice is not an issue.

even if it were the case that someone needed that income to afford a lawyer, they still wouldnt be able to afford as much for one as someone more wealthy. so what? thats the advantage of being wealthy. you can buy expensive clothes and you can hire expensive lawyers. anyone who cant afford one will be provided with one. if you think the public defender is inadequate or incompetent, then sue them for malpractice.

letting criminals go free to commit more crimes should not be an option.


Please do some basic research on the quality of our public defender system. It's absolutely abysmal in this country.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 15 2020 09:40pm
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 15 2020 09:42pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 15 2020 11:14pm)
This is demonstrably false. Public defenders' offices around the country have budgets that pale in comparison to that of prosecutions. It makes the news when a locality makes an attempt to erase the disparity.


do they need as large a budget? how many people have been falsely convicted as a result of a poor public defender?

and as i said before, is the cheap lawyer that is all someone who is so strapped for cash can afford to hire going to be all that better than the public defender anyway?

i dont see needing to work to pay a lawyer as a legitimate reason for letting accused criminals back on the streets.
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 15 2020 09:44pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 15 2020 11:40pm)


I love how you have to insult me instead of interact with what I actually posted though. Easier to pretend the other person is dumb when you just avoid what they say and strawman them into the ground.


oh, the irony. that exactly what you did in your first post.


Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 15 2020 09:44pm
There's no point in having bail. You're either too dangerous to be released or you're not.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Sep 15 2020 09:45pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 15 2020 08:42pm)
do they need as large a budget? how many people have been falsely convicted as a result of a poor public defender?

and as i said before, is the cheap lawyer that is all someone who is so strapped for cash can afford to hire going to be all that better than the public defender anyway?

i dont see needing to work to pay a lawyer as a legitimate reason for letting accused criminals back on the streets.


I dont' agree with the bail system but if you think the "one will be appointed to you" is working LOL
half the crime/drug prosecution system in the US is even in violation of your constitutional rights. But when cops and district courts shake hands, you don't get to say shit but thank you
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 15 2020 09:45pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 15 2020 11:31pm)
thats what theyve done in ny, and its proved a failure. im proposing doing away with bail in the opposite direction - dont let them out at all. no worry about them coming back if theyre not out.



Opposite doesn’t make sense either. In some places the court system is so clogged up that a speedy trial is impossible. We should have bail so people aren’t just sitting in jail for weeks jus to see a judge which is a penalty in itself but there needs to be some cost to that freedom to make sure the people understands they have to come back to court.


Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 15 2020 09:49pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 15 2020 11:40pm)
Holding every accused person without bail is not the solution. Letting everybody go without bail is not the solution either.

In our current system bail is about being rich and poor.

I love how you have to insult me instead of interact with what I actually posted though. Easier to pretend the other person is dumb when you just avoid what they say and strawman them into the ground.



Please do some basic research on the quality of our public defender system. It's absolutely abysmal in this country.



Your argument is trash and misses the whole point of the mechanic that bail serves. It’s not good enough to cry and say this isn’t fair and not offer a viable alternative. Either offer an alternative or acknowledge why money bail is a utilitarian mechanism.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 15 2020 09:49pm
e: double post

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 15 2020 09:50pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll