Quote (ofthevoid @ May 7 2020 03:47pm)
What the DOJ had to say.
I know you like yielding to authority and uncritically accepting 'expert' opinions, but why are so readily able to accept "anonymous sources said ____" for years, while completely disregarding what the chief legal body in this country has to say considering their work is actually public and transparent compared to the smoking mirrors of anonymous sources?
Like do you ever critically think about the things you believe?
Questioning Flynn on his call with the Russian ambassador, which he lied about publicly, was untethered to the investigation of whether he was a Russian agent? Seriously?
The rest of your post makes no sense.
Quote (Goomshill @ May 7 2020 03:49pm)
Its kind of amazing how willing you are to just handwave and endless series of misconduct, crimes, leaking, spying, bad faith, hoaxes, violations of protocol, fabrication of evidence and overt political intrigue, and then turn around and declare that 'the other guys' are the ones who don't play by the rules and are uniquely corrupt and evil. Even in the fact of prosecutorial misconduct like suppressing exculpatory evidence, you think that any attempt to address the misconduct is "improperly influence". How much institutionalized malfeasance are you willing to tolerate as long as its by the side you align yourself with? If Robert Mueller had abducted Julian Assange and waterboarded him for a few months straight to get him to confess his links to Russia, would you just agree it was justifiable enhanced interrogation in the defense of national security?
Again, you keep framing it as Trump cult vs the world. I don't accept your cult framing. So your argument doesn't even make sense.