Quote (fender @ 12 Dec 2019 16:31)
what i find somewhat funny is the tories constantly calling for snap elections to secure a more comfortably majority, when most of them insist that 'you can't just keep voting until you like the results', largely rejecting a second referendum.
while i'm personally against it, and would gladly see the UK leave as soon as possible, i still think the case for a second referendum is objectively a strong and fairly reasonable one, given how close the first one was, how unspecific the path forward was, and how uninformed the majority of voters were. we're now at a point where people could make an at least somewhat informed decision to give the government a more specific idea of what they actually want. the vague framing of the first one is unsurprisingly interpreted very differently, depending on who you ask.
A referendum on a decision as monumental and long-lasting as Brexit should require a supermajority of say 60%. Allowing it to pass on a simple majority was a mistake. But the rules absolutely cannot and should not be changed retroactively, just because some groups dont like the outcome.
Anyhow, effectively, today's election is this fabled second referendum on Brexit. This time, everyone knows what's at stake, everyone knows the rough contours of how Brexit will be pulled off if the Tories win a majority. This is the one big shot for Remainers to stop Brexit once and for all. If they fail to do so, then the typical stances of "people were just uninformed and didnt know what they were voting for" and "we demand a second chance for the British public to vote on this" will no longer be valid in my opinion.