d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Katie Hill Resigns
Prev12347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 28 2019 07:15am
Quote (excellence @ 28 Oct 2019 01:20)


You had the same eyes when Uncle Pablo bumped you in the bathroom
Banned
Posts: 87
Joined: Oct 25 2019
Gold: 0.00
Oct 28 2019 09:50am
Duncan Hunter
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 28 2019 10:16am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 28 2019 08:09am)
The slut could be the one who exposed her personal picture, for simple revenge or maybe for money.

Who can pretend to know the real, full, story ? Then shut the fuck up guys, and if there's something to blame it's the stupidity to trust people taking pictures of you in some "hot" moments.

If she was really such a slut she would never have let people taking pictures of her like that IMO.


She had a relationship with her staffer(s). the picture is all you need, as well as her admitting she had a relationship with a female staffer.

that's against the rules for her position. and against the rule the #metoo movement laid out for general rules people in power must abide to. you can't sleep with employees.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Oct 28 2019 10:18am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2019 05:16pm)
She had a relationship with her staffer(s). the picture is all you need, as well as her admitting she had a relationship with a female staffer.

that's against the rules for her position. and against the rule the #metoo movement laid out for general rules people in power must abide to. you can't sleep with employees.


I personally think the revenge porn is worse than the improper relationship. Any relationship with an employer+employee in it is morally iffy. However, it is relatively minor in the grand sense of improper things people in Congress do and have done.

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 28 2019 10:33am
Quote (thesnipa @ 28 Oct 2019 17:16)
She had a relationship with her staffer(s). the picture is all you need, as well as her admitting she had a relationship with a female staffer.

that's against the rules for her position. and against the rule the #metoo movement laid out for general rules people in power must abide to. you can't sleep with employees.


The exposition of personal pictures goes far beyond of what the repercussions of this "sleep" story should be, it completely destroyed her life.
What the hollandais posted above is as simple as right; read the first rule of the code of conduct/ethic of your congress if you can't get it.


1. A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House.

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 28 2019 10:37am
Quote (balrog66 @ 28 Oct 2019 12:18)
I personally think the revenge porn is worse than the improper relationship. Any relationship with an employer+employee in it is morally iffy. However, it is relatively minor in the grand sense of improper things people in Congress do and have done.

no one knows who leaked the “revenge” because apparently a bunch of her staff was sleeping around with her and there’s pictures with like 5-6 different participants at least (not all at the same time - yet at least)

with how sloppy this woman is she may have left her phone sitting out without a password protection during one of these escapades and some rando stumbled upon it
Quote (thesnipa @ 28 Oct 2019 12:16)
She had a relationship with her staffer(s). the picture is all you need, as well as her admitting she had a relationship with a female staffer.

that's against the rules for her position. and against the rule the #metoo movement laid out for general rules people in power must abide to. you can't sleep with employees.

metoo only applies to certain people
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 28 2019 10:42am
Quote (balrog66 @ Oct 28 2019 11:18am)
I personally think the revenge porn is worse than the improper relationship. Any relationship with an employer+employee in it is morally iffy. However, it is relatively minor in the grand sense of improper things people in Congress do and have done.


I personally don't think that employee/employer relationships are a no-go. in maybe half of the cases, sure. it's bad. and in cases of "hook ups" it's probably higher. aka a boss that sleeps with staffers repeatedly. but in cases where they are actually dating and have feelings, i think it's not problematic much of the time.

but for someone who was at the front of the line against Kavanaugh and willing to drag his personal life into the public eye, and i am not necessarily dragging her for it, i have no sympathy for how her situation is playing out. those in glass houses should not throw stones. she lives in a house of glass big time.

i support ousting these people asap in these situations. so that we have consistency, savage consistency is better than kind inconsistency, and so hopefully over time people with less issues will run for office. if you dont have a life you're proud of then stay out of the public eye imo. dont come to office with skeletons in your closet, no love child, no secret homosexuality, no drug use past, etc. if you've got it, flaunt it, or stay the hell out of the game.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 28 2019 10:43am
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Oct 28 2019 10:45am
WAAAAAAAAAAH

REPUBLICAN BAD

WAAAAAAAAAAH

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 28 2019 10:46am
kekes

https://www.govtrack.us/misconduct

In before your congress get populated by clones.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 28 2019 10:48am
Member
Posts: 54,768
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Oct 28 2019 10:47am
Quote (djman72 @ Oct 28 2019 09:45am)
WAAAAAAAAAAH

REPUBLICAN BAD

WAAAAAAAAAAH


based
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll