Quote (Goomshill @ 11 Aug 2018 18:25)
My favorite part of Germany's success story is how only 13.1% of their energy usage comes from renewables, yet they've foolishly shut down their nuclear power plants and are drying up their domestic lignite production, with the result that 80.5% of their total energy still comes from oil/gas/coal yet 50% of their imported gas, 40% of their oil and 30% of their hard coal comes from Russia. And they've still got no LNG terminals.
so the german people get to put their plastic bottles into bins so they can rub around some euro-coins and feel good about themselves, while suckling at the mammon's teat out of a straw laid across the baltic to Vyborg
agreed on the idiocy of forcefully abandoning nuclear power that quickly. big mistake imo, the only upside (apart from avoiding fukushima or chernobyl like disasters, and radioactive waste) is that it somewhat accelerates the development and funding of renewable energy sources, but that effect is rather small and overall certainly not worth it.
but then comes the fearmongering ofc:
'50 % of their imported gas is from russia and they still have no LNG terminals' ofc sounds much more sinister than the whole truth:
36% of our totally consumed gas is imported from russia, and that percentage keeps declining as we're actively diversifying our sources, specifically to be more independent from russia (government policy). we have secure LNG supply through the close terminals in rotterdam (netherlands), zeebrugge (belgium), and dunkerque (france) that are currently at just 6%, 12%, and 7% of their maximum capacity - AND we're still building our own terminal in brunsbüttel.
but hey, it's not a goo-shill post without a bit of trumpaganda, right?