d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Swamp Was Drained
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 7 2017 07:37am
If only the democratic nominee would of won things would be much different!!! :rolleyes:

So many of you were and still are crying that he was going to radically change things. Now you're crying that he's more of the same.

He could be Christ reborn and you guys would still be crying reeeee

Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Sep 7 2017 07:49am
Man the level people are willing to go to to rationalize Trump's constant hypocrisy is sad.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 7 2017 07:50am
is there not one trump supporter that sees something wrong with this :mellow:

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/349490-gop-leaders-prevent-votes-to-ban-federal-spending-at-trump

Quote
House GOP leaders won’t be allowing votes this week on Democratic proposals to prevent taxpayer funds from benefiting businesses owned by President Trump.

Multiple Democrats had filed amendments to a government spending package set to be considered on the House floor this week to ensure the president is not personally enriched by the federal government.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 7 2017 08:16am
Quote (duffman316 @ 7 Sep 2017 09:50)
is there not one trump supporter that sees something wrong with this :mellow:

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/349490-gop-leaders-prevent-votes-to-ban-federal-spending-at-trump


My accountant found that i overpaid in taxes in a prior year so i got it back this year. Money woulda stayed in the goverment's hands otherwise. I used some of those funds to dine at a restaurant in a Trump property.

Glad i could to contribute to this use of taxpayer funds to benefit the President :D
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 7 2017 09:16am
Quote (duffman316 @ Sep 7 2017 06:50am)
is there not one trump supporter that sees something wrong with this :mellow:

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/349490-gop-leaders-prevent-votes-to-ban-federal-spending-at-trump


Not a "Trump supporter" but they did the right thing.

The proposition is discriminatory. If they said hey, all hotels, resorts, buildings, businesses, fill in the blank should not be subsidized by taxpayers money, yes i would agree with the law. But to say Trumps businesses should not be subsidized simply because he's Trump and he's Potus is discriminatory and gives an unfair advantage to his competitors. This is pretty simple logic as to why the lawmakers did the right thing.

Lately a lot of your commentary & links resemble click bait tabloid shit, not impressed bro.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 7 2017 09:17am
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 7 2017 09:29am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 7 2017 10:16am)
Not a "Trump supporter" but they did the right thing.

The proposition is discriminatory. If they said hey, all hotels, resorts, buildings, businesses, fill in the blank should not be subsidized by taxpayers money, yes i would agree with the law. But to say Trumps businesses should not be subsidized simply because he's Trump and he's Potus is discriminatory and gives an unfair advantage to his competitors. This is pretty simple logic as to why the lawmakers did the right thing.

Lately a lot of your commentary & links resemble click bait tabloid shit, not impressed bro.


so you're ok with him being both a business man and a president at the same time? the conflict of interest doesn't bother you?
hotels/buildings/restaurants whatever will have to be booked at some point as it's part of political life so it doesn't make sense to forbid spending on them as a whole
but the fact that his businesses are booming as a direct consequence of his presidency wielding said political life back into his own business ventures is something that would bother me as as a tax payer
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 7 2017 09:34am
Quote (duffman316 @ Sep 7 2017 08:29am)
so you're ok with him being both a business man and a president at the same time? the conflict of interest doesn't bother you?
hotels/buildings/restaurants whatever will have to be booked at some point as it's part of political life so it doesn't make sense to forbid spending on them as a whole
but the fact that his businesses are booming as a direct consequence of his presidency wielding said political life back into his own business ventures is something that would bother me as as a tax payer


I'm well aware of conflict of interests. But to legislate discriminatory laws based on "maybe" is wrong.

Can you prove that his business is booming due to him being in office? Let's say the whole sector is booming why is the boom in his business attributed to cronyism meanwhile the competitors are just good business men or something?

You're reaching on a lot of your conclusions to justify unfair treatment.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 7 2017 09:46am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 7 2017 10:34am)
I'm well aware of conflict of interests. But to legislate discriminatory laws based on "maybe" is wrong.

Can you prove that his business is booming due to him being in office? Let's say the whole sector is booming why is the boom in his business attributed to cronyism meanwhile the competitors are just good business men or something?

You're reaching on a lot of your conclusions to justify unfair treatment.


it's rather blatant and in your face obvious with how often he frequents his own properties after the election not to mention the raised prices at said properties, what room is there for ambiguity here? it's not just him you're paying for, you're also paying for his entourage along with security/travel etc.

https://www.economist.com/news/business/21725303-six-months-mr-trumps-conflicts-interest-look-even-worse-how-donald-trump-monetising
Quote
Mr Shaub was unimpressed by Mr Trump’s appearances at his own for-profit properties, which he has visited more than 40 times as president—most recently to attend the US Women’s Open, held this month at one of his golf clubs, in New Jersey. The visits serve as a form of marketing, and his firm has not been shy about cashing in. Mar-a-Lago, a Trump resort in Florida where the president hosts other world leaders, doubled its initial fee for new members to $200,000 after the election. The club made a profit of $37m in the latest reporting period (January 2016-spring 2017), compared with $15.5m in 2014-15.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dc-hotel-turns-2-million-profit-in-four-months/2017/08/10/23bd97f0-7e02-11e7-9d08-b79f191668ed_story.html?utm_term=.0fd8b3b71bdc
Quote
The Trump Organization had projected that it would lose $2.1 million during the first four months of 2017 as it established a new hotel and convention business in the nation’s capital, according to newly released federal documents.

Instead the hotel, with its namesake in the White House down the street, is already turning a hefty profit and charging more for its rooms than most or all of the city’s other hotels.

The $4.1 million swing from projected losses to profitability represents a 192 percent improvement over what the Trump family planned to make when the company opened the hotel in the fall.

Driving the profits are the extraordinary prices guests have been willing to pay for rooms, including members of Trump’s Cabinet who have stayed or lived there, as well as big spending on food and beverages in the meeting areas, bar and restaurant — spots frequented by members of Trump’s inner circle and other Republican leaders.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 7 2017 09:53am
Quote (duffman316 @ Sep 7 2017 08:46am)
it's rather blatant and in your face obvious with how often he frequents his own properties after the election not to mention the raised prices at said properties, what room is there for ambiguity here? it's not just him you're paying for, you're also paying for his entourage along with security/travel etc.

https://www.economist.com/news/business/21725303-six-months-mr-trumps-conflicts-interest-look-even-worse-how-donald-trump-monetising


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dc-hotel-turns-2-million-profit-in-four-months/2017/08/10/23bd97f0-7e02-11e7-9d08-b79f191668ed_story.html?utm_term=.0fd8b3b71bdc


There is a billion articles out there that have a billion negative things to say about Trump. The way they framed this legislation is discriminatory. The premise here is not that hey the federal government is spending too much public money and we need to be cost effective rather hey, Trump is making money due to all these reasons so let's try to discriminate against his business because he shouldn't be benefiting as president.

They could of been smart about this and said, okay, federal officials, traveling for business or whatever get allotted x amount of $ which would essentially exclude Trumps pricey hotels but it would also exclude his competitors in a similar price range. Instead they just go after Trumps business revealing that this isn't actually about saving money but just to damage his business/reputation.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 7 2017 09:55am
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 7 2017 10:03am
Quote
Mr Shaub was unimpressed by Mr Trump’s appearances at his own for-profit properties, which he has visited more than 40 times as president—most recently to attend the US Women’s Open, held this month at one of his golf clubs


Drumpf is so powerful he forces the USGA and LPGA do the US Open on his properties!!!!! What they're not allowed to play at Augusta National!!!!! what a bigot!!!!
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll