d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Interesting Lecture About Jesus...
Prev123419Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 48,261
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Gold: 1,819.09
Sep 10 2013 12:58pm
Quote (Azrad @ Sep 10 2013 02:50pm)
Protected them by forcing them to wear marks to identify themselves as Jewish, lol.


They dressed differently, had more money and lived in Jewish quarters. There was no need for marks, you could easily tell a Jew apart from a European.
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 10 2013 03:14pm
Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 01:40pm)
Are they supposed to preface every mention of Jesus with, "He was a religious Jew". If course not. They had their own practices after Jesus' death, and they actively sought converts from Day One. They didn't start to ignore their Jewish background to get converts. Judaism doesn't actively seek coverts, which is a key aspect of the Jewish sect that would soon become Christianity. Paul was a prophet of the sect, he didn't seek to change it so it wasnt Judaism anymore. That slowly happened.

And I'm absolutely not kidding. The Roman Catholic Church had a policy of protecting Jew. It was the laypeople who lead an fought in the crusades, they had little if anything understanding of church doctrine, and even the bible. The church was quite angry at some of the things crusaders did, most notably the sack of Constantinople.


within a short time paul was making changes that jesus never would have approved of.

it doesnt help if church doctrine is to protect jews if they turn a blind eye to their followers massacring them.
Member
Posts: 48,261
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Gold: 1,819.09
Sep 10 2013 04:02pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 10 2013 05:14pm)
within a short time paul was making changes that jesus never would have approved of.

it doesnt help if church doctrine is to protect jews if they turn a blind eye to their followers massacring them.


How do you know Jesus wouldn't have approved of them? Did you know Paul of Tarsus personally? Did you know Jesus personally? You cannot possibly know that Jesus would have disproved of the approach Paul took.

They didn't take a blind eye to the lay persons who killed them. They preached and pastored about how Jews were people of the book who in end times would convert and accept Jesus as the son of God. Jews were killed for pretty much two reasons, from lesser lay peoples who suffered from poor pastoral care (Which was rampant in the middle ages), which in turn created many myths about Jews that would persist into the modern period. Later Protestant movements that were extremely anti-Semitic (Early Lutheranism especially) are irrelevant. The other reason is secular. Jews were part of the very small medieval middle class, and some more wealthy than many nobles. So by killing (Or at least displacing Jews), it allowed them to claim their wealth.
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Sep 10 2013 04:18pm
Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 11:58am)
They dressed differently, had more money and lived in Jewish quarters. There was no need for marks, you could easily tell a Jew apart from a European.
Jew's living in Europe aren't Europeans? :unsure:
And yes, they were forced to wear marks...
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 10 2013 04:22pm
Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 05:02pm)
How do you know Jesus wouldn't have approved of them? Did you know Paul of Tarsus personally? Did you know Jesus personally? You cannot possibly know that Jesus would have disproved of the approach Paul took.


jesus states multiple times in multiple places to follow the law. paul said not to follow the law. that seems pretty clear that what paul did goes against the teachings of jesus, ergo jesus wouldnt approve.

(for some direct quotes etc related to this, skip to about 33:00 in the video and watch for 5 min or so.)


Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 05:02pm)
They didn't take a blind eye to the lay persons who killed them. They preached and pastored about how Jews were people of the book who in end times would convert and accept Jesus as the son of God. Jews were killed for pretty much two reasons, from lesser lay peoples who suffered from poor pastoral care (Which was rampant in the middle ages), which in turn created many myths about Jews that would persist into the modern period. Later Protestant movements that were extremely anti-Semitic (Early Lutheranism especially) are irrelevant. The other reason is secular. Jews were part of the very small medieval middle class, and some more wealthy than many nobles. So by killing (Or at least displacing Jews), it allowed them to claim their wealth.


what did the church do to intervene?

This post was edited by ReturnFormer on Sep 10 2013 04:38pm
Member
Posts: 48,261
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Gold: 1,819.09
Sep 10 2013 04:32pm
Quote (Azrad @ Sep 10 2013 06:18pm)
Jew's living in Europe aren't Europeans? :unsure:
And yes, they were forced to wear marks...


Not at that time they weren't. Jews were closer to Arabs than they would have been to their European neighbours, especially in northern areas.

In many places, Jewish dress would have sufficed, and was not a problem because they were already dressed differently. Some individual kingdoms decided the yellow badge was necessary (Aragon, England whom never had a good relationship with Jewish communities, certain German principalities, etc.), but who knows how enforced this would have been, and it's certainly not a universal thing.

Quote (ReturnFormer @ Sep 10 2013 06:22pm)
jesus states multiple times in multiple places to follow the law. paul said not to follow the law. that seems pretty clear that what paul did goes against the teachings of jesus, ergo jesus wouldnt approve.

what did the church do to intervene?


That's not proof of anything. That's your own interpretation.

A good example is the Church issuing Papal Bulls during the Black Death for people to not blame the Jews for the illness. Bishops would often hide Jews in the church when violence was about as well. Certain Mendicant orders were anti-Semetic, but widespread anti-Semitism sponsored by Christian religion doesn't appear till the Reformation and it is never endorsed by the Catholic church.

This post was edited by Caedus on Sep 10 2013 04:36pm
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 10 2013 05:04pm
Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 05:32pm)


That's not proof of anything. That's your own interpretation.


how is that interpretation? jesus and his jewish followers said and did one thing, and paul said to do something else. that seems pretty contradictory to me. (for some direct quotes etc related to this, skip to about 32:00 in the video and watch for 6 min or so.) here, ill even bring a quote from a christian source ( http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=4705)

Quote
  "As the apostle to the Gentiles, Paul insisted that observance of the Mosaic Law, which entailed things like dietary regulations and circumcision, was no longer necessary. A new covenant had supplanted the old. Indeed, St. Paul admonished the Christians of Galatia for their observance of the Law, since the observance itself suggested that they considered faith in Christ insufficient for salvation (Galatians 3:1-29)."


clearly there were christians who still observed the laws, as jesus said to do, and just as clearly, paul was against that.


Quote (Caedus @ Sep 10 2013 05:32pm)

A good example is the Church issuing Papal Bulls during the Black Death for people to not blame the Jews for the illness. Bishops would often hide Jews in the church when violence was about as well. Certain Mendicant orders were anti-Semetic, but widespread anti-Semitism sponsored by Christian religion doesn't appear till the Reformation and it is never endorsed by the Catholic church.


as i said, anti-semitism is a side point, but heres a few sources. skip to 1:01:00 in the video and watch for a few minutes for some early sources of antisemitic doctrine from people such as justin the martyr and others.
Member
Posts: 26,653
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Gold: 0.00
Sep 10 2013 07:06pm
you continue to fight an imaginary battle rofl, most if not all churches would agree with you that jesus is jewish not sure what fantasy world you are living in
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Sep 10 2013 07:27pm
Quote (Clicquot @ Sep 10 2013 08:06pm)
you continue to fight an imaginary battle rofl, most if not all churches would agree with you that jesus is jewish not sure what fantasy world you are living in


rofl, maybe you should read more than one sentence before replying to a post.
Member
Posts: 1,266
Joined: Jan 30 2009
Gold: 2,852.00
Sep 10 2013 08:22pm
The Essenes which was a small Jewish group is really what evolved into Christianity. The Jews blast Christianity which was created by themselves. I don't see why any people should follow Jesus but the Jews. The advice and good teachings in the New Testament would bring ruin to any people that really followed it.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123419Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll