d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Would You Vote For Trump Again?
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,098
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 30 2025 09:13am
If presented the same two options as before, yes.

If presented someone better, no.

Do Democrats have one among them worth voting for currently, no, their platform is gross at the moment. Even Bernie talking shit

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on May 30 2025 09:13am
Member
Posts: 31,925
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
May 30 2025 11:43am
I don't vote.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
May 30 2025 11:59am
I unfortunately do not have enfranchisement
Member
Posts: 56,894
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
May 30 2025 12:05pm
Do Democrats have one among them worth voting for currently, no, their platform is gross at the moment. Even Bernie talking shit


Dems really seem to be banking on the "lets hope the trump presidency implodes" strategy.
Member
Posts: 28,972
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
May 30 2025 01:27pm
Dems really seem to be banking on the "lets hope the trump presidency implodes" strategy.


Member
Posts: 41,913
Joined: Jan 20 2006
Gold: 3,667.67
May 30 2025 01:29pm
No, we were promised mean tweets. where are the mean tweets ?
Member
Posts: 57,219
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
May 30 2025 08:00pm
couldnt
ineligible to run again under the 22nd
anyone saying otherwise I would recommend you take some US civics course
harvard is offering them for free

unless youre one of those guys who think harvard is woke because they are refusing to be molested by trumpf
Member
Posts: 54,054
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
May 30 2025 08:14pm
Dems really seem to be banking on the "lets hope the trump presidency implodes" strategy.


100%. It has to do with their lack of leadership, though. There's a huge power vacuum at the top of the Democratic party right now, one which presumably won't be filled until the next presidential primaries in 2027.

It was a similar story back in 2005. The Democrats were reeling back then just as much as they do now. In 2004, they lost to GWB yet again, he even won the popular vote which had eluded him the first time around. He came in with a trifecta and thought he had a strong mandate for his agenda. The parallels are uncanny. Back then, his presidency did indeed implode and Democrats ended up finding a very strong standard bearer.

A repeat of this playbook from 20 years ago is clearly the hopium Democrats are huffing right now. I doubt it will pan out that well for them this time around. Neither is a rockstar candidate like Obama on the horizon for them, nor are Trump's core policies as unpopular and billionaire-friendly as GWB's. As long as Trump doesn't overplay his hand on tariffs and avoids a recession, the GOP will imho be fine.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on May 30 2025 08:15pm
Member
Posts: 9,098
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 31 2025 05:22am
100%. It has to do with their lack of leadership, though. There's a huge power vacuum at the top of the Democratic party right now, one which presumably won't be filled until the next presidential primaries in 2027.

It was a similar story back in 2005. The Democrats were reeling back then just as much as they do now. In 2004, they lost to GWB yet again, he even won the popular vote which had eluded him the first time around. He came in with a trifecta and thought he had a strong mandate for his agenda. The parallels are uncanny. Back then, his presidency did indeed implode and Democrats ended up finding a very strong standard bearer.

A repeat of this playbook from 20 years ago is clearly the hopium Democrats are huffing right now. I doubt it will pan out that well for them this time around. Neither is a rockstar candidate like Obama on the horizon for them, nor are Trump's core policies as unpopular and billionaire-friendly as GWB's. As long as Trump doesn't overplay his hand on tariffs and avoids a recession, the GOP will imho be fine.



The Democrats strategy with Obama leveraged identity politics in their earliest form. Countless votes cast because guy is black and also talks like Carl Sagan flow. Followed by loser Hillary, then Dems captured the jerk back with Biden, followed by Kamala. I'm expecting a disabled black-nativeamerican they/them agnostic rando next at this rate.

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on May 31 2025 05:22am
Member
Posts: 39,003
Joined: Jan 11 2006
Gold: 5,009.35
May 31 2025 06:43am
The Democrats strategy with Obama leveraged identity politics in their earliest form. Countless votes cast because guy is black and also talks like Carl Sagan flow. Followed by loser Hillary, then Dems captured the jerk back with Biden, followed by Kamala. I'm expecting a disabled black-nativeamerican they/them agnostic rando next at this rate.


I'm genuinely curious if they will pair another woman with another guy named Tim. It would actually be hilarious.

Hillary/Tim - lose
Kamala/Tim - lose

If they do it, we are 100% living in a simulation.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll