Since you see so many Trump supporters happy about the defunding of national parks and their federal workers.
If you put all else aside, he was a very progressive candidate for his time. Whether it be government reformation or labor reform (on the side of labor rights). He has many qualities of candidates like Bernie Sanders today and less qualities like your typical Republican.
See, this simply isn't true. The Republican party at large have ALWAYS been on the cutting edge of pushing workers rights. To the point of ending slavery. Like, what are you talking about?
Government reform? Republican.
If you wanted to talk about "national parks" we could go there. The Federal Government was only allowed Washington DC. 3 States were bullied into ceding DC to the Federal Government, to prevent any one State from gaining control over the Federal Government.
Fast forward to today, and due to creative uses of waterways acts, redefining Tribal land as "federal" land, etc. the Federal Government now directly owns 1/3rd (nearly, it's 28%) of the land in the United States. Something neither guaranteed in nor allowed by the Constitution. That percentage was less than 1% during Teddy's time.
The idea that the Federal Government is going to steal all the land and resources from the States, then NOT use it productively, then steal the wealth of the citizenry to "tend" that land only to have it all go up in flames in wildfires every year is absurd. That IS a progressive ideal. It is NOT a Republican, or conservative ideal.
It's not that Republicans OR Trump supporters don't want to see Federal "parks" properly tended. We don't agree they should be "Federal" land at all.