didnt they convert to islam?

i was thinking more of crusaders

This post was edited by Budgeting on Jan 30 2025 04:51pm

No, they slaughtered them outright, they destroyed Baghdad in whole

The Mongol religion, which was monotheistic and animistic, was starkly opposed to Islam. In particular, Mongols were the world leaders in meritocracy & women's rights at the time.

Name one Christian country, there isn't one, they are all secular.

To add: the Mongol religion and tradition was very tolerant of other religions, which was necessary for them to conquer vast territories with little resistance. Islam, in contrast, has zero tolerance for other religions

You were successfuly brainwashed by this campaign:
https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/israel-boosts-propaganda-funding-150-million-sway-global-opinion-against?nid=416327&topic=Israel%2527s%2520war%2520on%2520Gaza&fid=541216

Mongols were nothing like you imagine them to be. Most correct assessment came from Iranians and Chinese.

What campaign is that?

The Mongols were the most technologically advanced civilization at the time, and had the most advanced military logistics & strategy that surpassed all of their peers. They incorporated countless societies and peoples into their Imperial state. Their terms were: submit to our Imperium and contribute a regiment of soldiers to the Golden Horde. Refuse and be annihilated. Being a Mongol emissary was the most dangerous job in the world as they were often sent home in pieces, leading to the total destruction of the perpetrators

Israel's anti muslim campaign financed by 150m more to spread on all platforms "muslims bad" message. Expirience teaches that when something is repeated long enough, people start to pass it as a fact.
The aim is to dehumanize the opponent and to make any means necessary "justified". The same happened to Russians during the start of the conflict.

The problematic part is people don't forget. While I can't stand islam and judaism, I'm not going out of my wait to slander, insult or demaen them soleily based on their beliefs. That would make me the shitty person.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Jan 30 2025 05:48pm

Blaming anti-Islam sentiment on a nascent nation not even 100 years old is wild.

I mean it's not even wild, it's so idiotic it doesn't even warrant a response. Is this you or someone else?

This post was edited by El1te on Jan 30 2025 05:46pm

They're slaughtering your fellow citizens in the streets with knives and vehicles my guy

That's the narrative. The real problem is we have uncontrolled immigration which the US also had under Biden. Those Colombian and Venezuelian gangs did far worse things than the few cases amplified in Europe.
We need controlled migration and detention for extremists/ violent criminals. Who is not doing anything? The executive, the government.
If all muslims were terrorists ( we have more than 7 million out of 83 million) we'd have a slaughterhouse in every city. That's obviously not true. You can't blame muslims for not taking care of the extremists. They are not the government, mob justice is illegal. The politicians, police and prosecuters don't do their jobs.
Well, time to finally elect someone who does on February. We don't need someone as radical as Trump but close enough.

There is a saying in German: "Der Fisch stinkt vom Kopf" ( the fish starts to smell from the head). In this case meaning, leaders and politicians lead to a disaster whose blame they typically deflect on subordinates/minorities/vulnerable people where they expect the least amount of backlash.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Jan 30 2025 06:02pm