Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Jul 26 2024 04:14am)
Nah its a bad plan imo. Broaden the appeal by selecting a man.
Trump fucked up picking Vance, he is already dropping clangers.
Trump Haley would have been a more electable duo.
Trump had two options, he could play for the latino vote (black with tim scott wouldn't actually dent numbers) or he could play for the swing states
Vance was very purposeful and the same reason the convention was in milwaukee, they want to raise up working populists. He certainly isn't doing a good job on his introduction but c'mon, we can't even imagine what a VP debate would look like right now because the democrats are in such disarray we don't have a VP pick as of a week ago. All the republicans have to do to capitalize on Vance is keep the focus on the blue collar issues.
What does Haley actually win? Are there enough suburban white women left in america who aren't already reflexively opposed to Trump, willing to vote for him just because he has a female VP?
This is pretty much the only thing Kamala as a pick is even trying to get in the first place;
https://x.com/zackoryk/status/1815761607944720782Trump won't pick up female identity vote against Kamala either way, so the fact he picked a man who attacks a different angle was prescient.