Quote (Plaguefear @ Jun 15 2024 09:34pm)
You think the families of mass shooting victims should be harassed and lied about with no protection?
Did he commit the crime of harassment in CT state law as a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum 90 days in jail or a $500 fine? Narrowly defined as requiring communication directly to the victims in a manner likely to cause terror, intimidation or alarm, via telegraph or mail or electronic facsimile or telephone call, or meeting place only if it originated or was received within the jurisdiction?
He's not breaking the law, its a civil case with a civil remedy. And in a sane and functional court system that would mean he'd be found liable for harassment and ordered to provide proportional and reasonable recompense. You know, maybe something as hefty as a few thousand bucks in fines. Instead they ordered him to pay a preposterously astronomical sum greater than the GDP of the Solomon Islands. They ordered him to pay 15x the cost of India's Chandrayaan-2 moon mission.
This is not a subtle point or hard to pick up. Viewpoint discrimination on the basis of applying wildly disproportionate and unreasonable civil penalties is discriminatory and unconstitutional. If you said you're going to apply 1500000x the penalties to black men who commit the same offense as white men, we'd instantly call it institutional racism that's expressly forbidden by the 14th amendment. If a white guy gets a sentence of 2 minutes in prison for a crime and a black guy gets 5.7 years, that's racist. And if a judge and jury are going to completely give a pass to people posting conspiracy theories online about Israeli victims of October 7th or the Trump supporter ambushed and murdered in Portland or the people attacked by the mob during the George Floyd riots (including baseless and inflammatory conspiracy theories spread by politicians like the mayor), but at the same time they will turn around and fine Alex Jones more money than the combined budgets of all four disney star wars movies because of the mean words he said- its clearly viewpoint discrimination, punishing someone for their political beliefs and affiliation.