Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 26 2024 10:00pm)

you're*

Quote (TidsL @ Jan 26 2024 11:18pm)

Seems so corrupt, I don't believe it. Is there evidence? How much did people like judge etc get under the table you think...
The numbers too... I just read the article. Just what...

Quote (thumper01 @ Jan 27 2024 08:28am)

How can you say it's corrupt without knowing if there was evidence presented to the jury? It's clear you already have your mind made up lol

Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 27 2024 12:51am)

That was found in the previous lawsuit. There was lots of testimony, and had Trump's famous deposition where he claimed Carrol "wasn't his type" and then mistook her photo for his ex wife.

In this suite there was no need to establish Trump sexually assaulted her because it was established by a jury in the previous case. Since it was already found in a court by a jury it can be taken as a matter of law that he did it for this case.

Which is why this case was just about damages since he won't stop defaming her.

Quote (bogie160 @ Jan 27 2024 02:04am)

Yes, but surely "she might have been his type" isn't evidence worth much in anyone's book. What compelling evidence (of the assault) convinced the jury that Donald Trump was, more probable than not, responsible for damages to Jean Carroll?

Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 27 2024 02:44am)

She presented a compelling story that convinced the jury by telling them she didn't remember what year it happened and had no evidence she's ever met Trump