d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > This Specific Video
Prev123412Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,121
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Jan 21 2024 09:07pm
It's grotesquely inhumane. Without a proper border, US is championing the modern Trail of Tears, both outside our border and at these peoples final destination. Allegedly 300,000 migrants crossed in December, at that rate we add two Nebraska's.

Member
Posts: 22,435
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Jan 21 2024 09:29pm
Quote (El1te @ Jan 21 2024 06:55pm)
I do think it's the proper strategy for the goal of world peace.

World peace, or regional peace, is predicated on rival nations, who each vie for the greatest outcomes for their nation and peoples, to respectfully co-exist, of which a massive factor of that is recognizing and respecting rival nation's borders. This is predicated on each party agreeing to a legitimate border (the Ukraine Russia war is a perfect example of a border dispute).

Opening the floodgates has historical precedent for not being a solution for peace. The fall of the Roman Empire was largely caused by open borders with unfettered barbarian immigration, peoples who had no respect for the rule of law, leading to the dark ages.

The main idea in my view is that civilizations and/or nations must develop on their own accord. A nation or country is the macroensemble of its people, nothing less. The violence that exists outside our borders is not typically ours to solve, however as I myself an am imperialist, I think we should expand our Empire and rule of law outside our borders, while respecting their cultures to a certain degree.


You know, that imperialist perspective is intriguing from a philosophical perspective, despite my own values differing greatly.
Member
Posts: 22,435
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Jan 21 2024 09:32pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 21 2024 06:59pm)
It's not like anyone invited the tens of thousands of illegals.
I hate to sound cold, but it's like... "playing in traffic". Ya gotta expect to get run over, when you do that.

I mean, how many of you would open your doors for some starving vets (aka citizens), if they came and sat on your door step?


Here's the thing: My answer to your question is a "I would not"; however, the key here is that my "no" is not a response to the opportunity to help them, but it's a "no" to the level of burden placed upon me as an individual. We would better meet the needs of such people through a more collaborative approach than me just taking someone I've never met before and who may or may not have all kinds of health complications that are needing to be attended to, because I as an individual have very little carrying capacity relative to a collective. So I believe we should try and develop social systems that accommodate this evolutionary pressure. It's "No" because it's inefficient--ethics can be completely ignored here.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Jan 21 2024 09:33pm
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 21 2024 09:57pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 21 2024 07:29pm)
You know, that imperialist perspective is intriguing from a philosophical perspective, despite my own values differing greatly.


It is the primary rationale behind all conquerors, it's legitimacy dependant on how it is done, the Nazis being the best example of how not to expand, and the old British Empire and the modern day Chinese or American (in most instances) hegemony being the best examples on how to morally expand.

Most of us live in the legacy of the British Empire, who brought the less-corruptible rule of common law and justice, peace & order through friendly trade relations. With enduring languages, law, and culture remaining today, which is under attack in the present.

To me it's clearly the philosophical moral option provided it is done as such. And there lies the quandry of human rule, ultimately everything comes down to the morality of the individual and how they can expand their influence socially within various hierarchies and sub-hierarchies.
Member
Posts: 22,435
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Jan 21 2024 10:10pm
Quote (El1te @ Jan 21 2024 07:57pm)
It is the primary rationale behind all conquerors, it's legitimacy dependant on how it is done, the Nazis being the best example of how not to expand, and the old British Empire and the modern day Chinese or American (in most instances) hegemony being the best examples on how to morally expand.

Most of us live in the legacy of the British Empire, who brought the less-corruptible rule of common law and justice, peace & order through friendly trade relations. With enduring languages, law, and culture remaining today, which is under attack in the present.

To me it's clearly the philosophical moral option provided it is done as such. And there lies the quandry of human rule, ultimately everything comes down to the morality of the individual and how they can expand their influence socially within various hierarchies and sub-hierarchies.


So you think there's too much homogeneity in humanity?
Member
Posts: 105,128
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 21 2024 10:17pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 21 2024 10:32pm)
Here's the thing: My answer to your question is a "I would not"; however, the key here is that my "no" is not a response to the opportunity to help them, but it's a "no" to the level of burden placed upon me as an individual. We would better meet the needs of such people through a more collaborative approach than me just taking someone I've never met before and who may or may not have all kinds of health complications that are needing to be attended to, because I as an individual have very little carrying capacity relative to a collective. So I believe we should try and develop social systems that accommodate this evolutionary pressure. It's "No" because it's inefficient--ethics can be completely ignored here.




There's no collaborative effort to help starving vets for example... either.
Hell, the left has been trying to shut down the few VA hospitals that we do have.

And that's just one of the citizen groups that are being ignored. There are many others.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 21 2024 10:26pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 21 2024 08:10pm)
So you think there's too much homogeneity in humanity?


I don't think there's too much or too little, homogeneity is good at regional scales and heterogeneity is good across the world.

On Imperialism we already have this state today as the status quo. The POTUS is the de facto Imperator of the greater Anglo-American Empire, defined by the reach of its military and judicial control (Western Europe, the UK etc. must conform to judicial standards subject to US review). States that are outside of military and judicial reach are not within the Empire. Then you have other spheres of control like China and Russia.

This post was edited by El1te on Jan 21 2024 10:27pm
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Jan 21 2024 10:42pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 21 2024 08:17pm)
There's no collaborative effort to help starving vets for example... either.
Hell, the left has been trying to shut down the few VA hospitals that we do have.

And that's just one of the citizen groups that are being ignored. There are many others.


"Few VA hospitals"

They're one of the largest networks in the world
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jan 21 2024 10:44pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 21 2024 08:43pm)
What are your thoughts on this Channel 5 coverage? Having a border like this feels very inhumane, I think. Does that mean we shouldn't have a border at all? I don't know--but, I can't help feel that the current situation is inhumane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dQ4-VNaG3s


Having a border is what makes a country possible. The moral thing to do is dissuade them from making this journey by vigorously enforcing border security.

The alternative is allowing everyone in, but that road means eliminating social safety nets for immigrants and civilians alike. We can't afford to pay for our own standard of living, and the more benefits you offer the greater the demand will be.
Member
Posts: 105,128
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 21 2024 10:47pm
Quote (Sioux @ Jan 21 2024 11:42pm)
"Few VA hospitals"

They're one of the largest networks in the world




You're preaching to the choir son. :/
I've been a VA patient for 25 years. Yes it's a big network... but when you count hospitals instead of the size of the... "chain", the VA is tiny.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123412Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll