Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 19 2024 08:13am)
One level-headed statement doesn't undo the violence, fundamentalism, oppression of women and general backwardness of the Taliban. The proper argument to make with regard to Afghanistan isn't that the Taliban were the good guys, or at least "not that bad". No, the correct argument is, and always has been, that the country is a lost cause, that efforts to develop a civil society and a democracy over there are doomed that the whole war and occupation were therefore a waste of resources. This does not, however, make the Taliban any less awful.
Any fair assessment of the Arab world has always been that their cultures are simply incompatible with democracy at best and openly hostile to it at worst. Most of them are tribal and sectarian, few have national identities, and those that do straddle between predisposition to monarchies and religious zealots who must impose their will on others. It was absolutely a waste of resources and a sham to try to build a democracy, but does it make the Taliban awful? The Taliban are a bunch of goat herding tribal chieftains who have learned to coexist by respecting each others autonomy and generally leaving each other alone. That's about the extent of their national identity- that and banning opium. Their oppression of women and general backwards fundamentalism falls more on their individual regressiveness and islam. That's what the
people believe in. If you gave them a free and fair vote, that's what they'd vote for. If it wasn't the Taliban, it would be someone else. The Taliban aren't imposing that upon them, and only a foreign master imposing our will upon them could try to change their way for them. And thus was the failed legacy of American neoimperialism and world morality police.