Well he's got nothing to fear from his upcoming legal cases then.

Both the prosecution and some of the courts are pressing for timelines far tighter than standard in any other case. The only reasonable explanation to me is that they're working with the November election deadline in mind. As far as I'm aware, that would violate DOJ guidelines, but in any case it's clearly a political decision. Political decisions in the judiciary undermine the rule of law, and we're seeing this play out in real time with collapsing public faith in a number of "rules based" institutions, from the judiciary to the FBI.

Lol

How strong is your shovel arm? Back to work boy

Ah, now it makes a bit more sense why you only felt comfortable discussing with OP.

You don't see why DoJ might want prosecution to wrap before the election for any reason aside from "ELECTION INTERFERENCE!"?

Don't get it twisted bogie, you're just TiStuff with a larger vocabulary. Same level of critical thinking.

This post was edited by Sioux on Dec 28 2023 06:27pm

Courts and prosecutors have an obligation to set schedules in line with the public interest. Getting a major candidate's trial done before the general election is in line with that.

You can find phrases such as

"All stakeholders, including the general public, have a vested interest in the efficient and
just handling of criminal cases and we make these proposals with that goal in mind"

Just by googling "best practices for trial scheduling DOJ".


But I suspect you know this already, and are just lieing, as you always do.

reeee

remember when fraud lefties were all a giddy bout his taxes?? wut ever happened to all that??? .........u gona get him this time



FIFY




REEE



courts all about public interest lol CHEEEEEEEEEEETT

Lol.