Quote (gnarjay @ 30 Nov 2023 10:39)
he's responsible for a LOT of the international hostility towards the united states because of his policy decisions + agenda. yeah, he was smart and had no morals so he was an "effective" diplomat. if thats your standard for a good person then we're speaking different languages here
millions and millions of innocent people would be alive today if it werent for him. it's a shame he died of old age and not by the fists of a Laotian
Yes , but people fear and respect him. He and Nixon kept the Soviets at bay. Made the Chinese Communist become a temporary bulwark against the USSR.
He is top class realpolitk.
I don't give a shit what people think about a good or bad person or moral whatsoever. There are no morals in international politics as you can see in the recent threads that are being posted.