he smokes like 30 cigars a day dude

Wtf



TiStuff 2024 !!!

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Sep 26 2023 10:53am

almost all of his ideas make a decent amount of sense. give everyone a free photo ID, make it illegal for employers to give money to anyone that doesnt have one, and enforce it. like that the border issue dries up for migrant workers, and u can crack down even harder because the leftover traffic is cartel predominately. give people access to a 3% fixed mortgage with the US govt as the cosigner and let the govt possess the house if they default. better the US govt owns it than blackrock. get the ball rolling on anti trust issues that plague multiple sectors and should have been destroyed a long time ago.

i personally dont care about his vaccine stances even though i dont largely agree, because vaccines aren't a presidential issue. for the most part his whole platform would be hard to get through wit h EOs. but he may get some bipartisan support as a fence sitter, who knows.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 26 2023 11:10am

I'm not gonna care from this point for whatever you say or link on here at this forum, what the hell is wrong with you haha, why would anyone?

with the tone you put in your first reply (who the hell goes there first thing for no reason to a complete stranger), you exposed yourself with no doubt as someone not worth any respect.

You would never in life talk like this to people's faces, definitely not mine. Maybe to someone much smaller than you. But online - wow.. that's the one place where you can feel courageous enough to talk, like the one brave absolute keyboard warrior bitch you are. Congratudolances.

This post was edited by TidsL on Sep 26 2023 11:33am

and just like that the thread becomes about why he has a scratchy voice.

He would make a great VP for trump since the White House and dnc isn’t going to give him a chance. I’d vote for him over Biden or Trump.

This post was edited by Landmine on Sep 26 2023 11:30am

do you support his stance on banning fracking? It would completely skyrocket the price of oil, I don't think it's a good idea.

We had this profile of politicians here, it happened several times, honestly i can't recollect some example but i would push to find it back eventually, if you really want to know.
So it's pretty simple: usually they target the "average educated" and are basically "populists of a second degree", i would say. They pickup alot of decent-looking points making things promising.

Usually they fade away because of incompetence and lack of real substance. Who know, maybe he can do it in U.S. Trump won (and is even still president lol)

/e mutlipartism gives some kind of a global picture...

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Sep 26 2023 11:36am

i have a lot of fracking concerns, but i dont support an immediate ban. im still in the camp of people though who want to divest greatly from oil use in the US, if only to divest greatly from the middle east. even beyond environmental concerns, which i share, being a big customer of OPEC countries, Russia and venezuala isnt a good thing. but i wouldnt look to force that artificially by inflating US gas prices.

we need cheap energy, you can't really just divest from oil without enormous advancements. You can be in support of alternative fuel sources, such as advocating for more nuclear energy, but banning fracking (immediate or not) would not support your desire to be less dependent on opec and obviously would have the opposite effect.

This post was edited by majorblood on Sep 26 2023 11:43am