d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Transgender
Prev12347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 46,976
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 5 2023 11:10pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 5 2023 10:02pm)
Post the data, because you're just making things up lol


i dont have time for it right now dude
why dont you make some kind of effort??????
google "plastic synthetic estrogen"
o look at these titles
Most Plastic Products Release Estrogenic Chemicals - NCBI
Study: Most Plastics Leach Hormone-Like Chemicals
Estrogenic chemicals often leach from BPA-free plastic ...

Just How Harmful Are Bisphenol A Plastics?
Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › just-ho...
Sep 1, 2008 — ... bisphenol A came into use as a synthetic estrogen in the 1930s. ... BPA yielded the clear, polycarbonate plastic of shatter-resistant ...

Chemical components of plastics as endocrine disruptors: ...

doesnt make any difference does it. just move on to the next deception. nothing about lefties are sincere.
Member
Posts: 15,801
Joined: Jul 9 2021
Gold: 291.00
Apr 5 2023 11:41pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Apr 5 2023 09:42pm)
i have posted on this before so i am talking from memory. scientific studys shows the increase is from pollution (plastic pollution) that breaks down into like a synthetic estrogen and interferes with the development of the fetus (the wiring among other things). but your not allowed to mention it. also complicated by the grooming of children at an impressionable age.

micro plastic is in everything. so perhaps there is no reversing it. also powers that be wont allow it to be reversed.

(anyway its something like that, remember i said from memory, i dont have the actual data on hand.)

.............FYI from my perspective I couldnt answer your poll


Plastic pollution into estrogen???

This sounds like Alex Jones the frogs meme lol

This post was edited by ChocolateCoveredGummyBears on Apr 5 2023 11:41pm
Member
Posts: 46,976
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 5 2023 11:46pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 5 2023 10:02pm)
Post the data, because you're just making things up lol


lets talk about another lie deception atheists like to propagate.
they like to say to the christian "its your claim the onus is on you" i am afraid not "the onus" is on the lazy excuse making atheist.........or you at least share in it.
Member
Posts: 46,976
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 5 2023 11:52pm
Quote (ChocolateCoveredGummyBears @ Apr 5 2023 10:41pm)
Plastic pollution into estrogen???

This sounds like Alex Jones the frogs meme lol


the frog thing was a pesticide
Silencing the Scientist: Tyrone Hayes on Being Targeted By Herbicide Firm Syngenta


Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Apr 6 2023 12:07am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 5 2023 09:48pm)
You should post the data because I know for a fact you're wrong.

The reason I know its wrong is because I don't think there's a single plastic that is even close to the structure of an estrogen, and the most common plastics are pretty drastically different so I can't imagine a feasible mechanism that would get even a tiny amount of estrogens from them. (masters in physical organic chemistry)

And we don't have good data on long term exposure to microplastics, especially don't have data on something as specific as fetal development, and especially don't have data that is reliable enough to disambiguate the impact from social attitudes.


I would guess he is talking about BPA and then BPS w/ oestrogens

most relevant study i can find on the entire idea, very long though
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068600/#B30-ijerph-17-01212

w/ this specifically discussing bpa/bps
https://www.nature.com/articles/508306a#auth-Josie-Glausiusz

it's just not being explained very well

This post was edited by majorblood on Apr 6 2023 12:08am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 6 2023 12:41am
Quote (majorblood @ Apr 6 2023 01:07am)
I would guess he is talking about BPA and then BPS w/ oestrogens

most relevant study i can find on the entire idea, very long though
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068600/#B30-ijerph-17-01212

w/ this specifically discussing bpa/bps
https://www.nature.com/articles/508306a#auth-Josie-Glausiusz

it's just not being explained very well


Very interesting. Although it definitely isn't the cause of transgenderism lol
Member
Posts: 50,768
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Apr 6 2023 01:47am
Transgender discussions usually get bogged down in red herring arguments about corner cases like klinefelter syndrome or intersex or other stuff that doesn't apply in 99.999% of cases, and in arguments from authority when those authorities are obviously warped and beholden to a trans-activist social agenda. If a study rejects their premise they'll reject the study and pillory those who wrote it, if a doctor has ethical qualms about mutilating children they'll blacklist the doctor, etc etc. Very trodden discussions. What really matters is when you take a step back and evaluate what you can see with your own eyes. The black box analysis of a decade of transgender socio-politics. You don't need to decipher the definitions or mechanics if you can look at the input and the output and figure if it makes sense or not. When I look at a violent trans activist antifa rally and see degenerate goblins, they clearly aren't legitimate gender dysphoria who will have the best outcomes from delusion-affirmative treatment. They're just radicals indoctrinated into a debauched cultural movement, and that's hardly unique looking back at history. In another time they would be goths or manson cultists or bohemians or fops. When we're talking about a land whale proclaimed activist like Jonathan Yaniv, who was really just a fat pedophile who wanted to bone little girls, we still see the trans activists circle the wagons and scream bloody murder if you 'deadname her'. The guy sent to a women's prison and impregnating multiple women? The children too young to know or care about sexual identity, being raised by deranged liberal parents? We can see the output of that black box, and it clearly ain't right.

That's the distinction when you compare it to something like homosexuality. History and contemporary culture always had ample cases of people clearly hardwired to be gay, who weren't the product of any social nurturing to mold them into it, and who were completely normal and productive members of society and could behave like sane, civil people instead of howler monkeys throwing shit at everyone who didn't respect their pronouns. People are born gay, but they aren't born in the wrong gender and can't change their gender.
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Apr 6 2023 01:52am
medical anomaly, like when you are born with some medical afflictions.

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Apr 6 2023 01:53am
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Apr 6 2023 02:16am
What difference does it make?
Member
Posts: 56,966
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Apr 6 2023 04:25am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 6 2023 03:47am)
Transgender discussions usually get bogged down in red herring arguments about corner cases like klinefelter syndrome or intersex or other stuff that doesn't apply in 99.999% of cases, and in arguments from authority when those authorities are obviously warped and beholden to a trans-activist social agenda. If a study rejects their premise they'll reject the study and pillory those who wrote it, if a doctor has ethical qualms about mutilating children they'll blacklist the doctor, etc etc. Very trodden discussions. What really matters is when you take a step back and evaluate what you can see with your own eyes. The black box analysis of a decade of transgender socio-politics. You don't need to decipher the definitions or mechanics if you can look at the input and the output and figure if it makes sense or not. When I look at a violent trans activist antifa rally and see degenerate goblins, they clearly aren't legitimate gender dysphoria who will have the best outcomes from delusion-affirmative treatment. They're just radicals indoctrinated into a debauched cultural movement, and that's hardly unique looking back at history. In another time they would be goths or manson cultists or bohemians or fops. When we're talking about a land whale proclaimed activist like Jonathan Yaniv, who was really just a fat pedophile who wanted to bone little girls, we still see the trans activists circle the wagons and scream bloody murder if you 'deadname her'. The guy sent to a women's prison and impregnating multiple women? The children too young to know or care about sexual identity, being raised by deranged liberal parents? We can see the output of that black box, and it clearly ain't right.

That's the distinction when you compare it to something like homosexuality. History and contemporary culture always had ample cases of people clearly hardwired to be gay, who weren't the product of any social nurturing to mold them into it, and who were completely normal and productive members of society and could behave like sane, civil people instead of howler monkeys throwing shit at everyone who didn't respect their pronouns. People are born gay, but they aren't born in the wrong gender and can't change their gender.


very based
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll