d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Solomon Islands Question
12313Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 56,415
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 579,503.02
May 5 2022 12:24pm
A brief Blurb ~

The US sees China as its future enemy. Therefore the US appears to be doing what it can to curtail or diminish China's soft/insideous expansions / sphere of influence. China is step by step gaining more soft power through its policies.

(from thediplomat.com):

In the past two months, the China-Solomon Islands security pact has made news headlines in the region and beyond. It has become the topic of election debates in Australia. Senior delegations from the United States, Australia and Japan visited Solomon Islands to discuss the pact. New Zealand, Fiji (on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum as rotating chair), and the Federated States of Micronesia have also expressed concerns over the issue.

Under the security agreement, Solomon Islands’ government may request China to send police and military personnel to help stabilize the situation in the Pacific country and protect Chinese diplomats, companies, and diaspora in the event of future social unrest like the riots in April 2006 and November 2021. What is more concerning to traditional powers and the region is that this pact could pave the way for China to establish a military base in Solomon Islands, though these speculations have been dismissed by Beijing and Honiara.

Prior to the signing of the pact on March 30, 2022, China sent nine police officers to Solomon Islands in January 2022. They provided training to the Solomon Islands police force on public management, riot response and other tactical programs. The training was questioned by some opposition parliamentarians concerned about the impact on the country’s police, which have traditionally been trained by Australia and New Zealand. Another task of the Chinese police team is to provide diplomatic security to its embassy and offer security advice to Chinese companies and migrants.

More broadly, the growth of China’s engagement with Solomon Islands has been impressive since the latter switched its diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in September 2019. Less than three years later, the relationship covers a wide range of areas such as high-level meetings, infrastructure support, sister-city relations (for example between Honiara city and Jiangmen city in Guangdong), medical team and COVID-19 assistance. The Chinese embassy has also donated materials and equipment like diesel fuel, agricultural contractors, and sewing machines to improve its relations with Malaita province, a place that has strong support for Taiwan.

A key motive behind China’s endeavors is to showcase the benefits Pacific Island countries can receive if they abandon Taiwan and recognize Beijing. Also, there has been opposition within Solomon Islands’ society about the switch. This gives China another impetus to support Sogavare. Back in November 2019, the opposition noted that they support official relations with Taiwan. With Solomon Islands’ upcoming elections in 2023 (or 2024, if deferred), the opposition has made it clear that if elected, they will terminate this security pact with China.

The pact has attracted widespread debates among different groups in Solomon Islands and generated mixed feelings. There are obviously those who see the security pact as the surest way of enhancing Solomon Islands’ socioeconomic development, alongside continued engagement with other traditional development partners. The pact’s advocates say China will support the Solomon Islands government in providing a secure and safe environment for investors, who will contribute to the country’s development, a view that is strongly backed by Sogavare.

On the other hand, many expressed fears that the pact may give more leverage to China’s influence, which may ultimately undermine Solomon Islands’ democratic ideals, a fear also shared by leading political figures in the opposition. Among civil society, two of the most vocal groups are Solomon Islands Council of Women and Transparency Solomon Islands. They both raised concerns that the pact lacked holistic consultation, does not represent the interest of the general public including women in the country, and politically sells out Solomon Islands’ sovereignty to China. These claims have been rejected by the Minister for Women, Youth and Development.

So far, the provinces in Solomon Islands have not made direct commentaries on the security deal, nor have informal governance structures such as church groups and traditional leadership groups like house of chiefs.

...Alarmed by the security pact, the United States is expected to enhance their diplomatic, aid, and economic relations with Solomon Islands in the near future. Back in 2019, the Solomon Islands parliamentary taskforce established to provide advice to the government on whether to switch recognition from Taipei to Beijing criticized the United States for its neglect of economic development in Solomon Islands. The U.S. proposal to re-open its embassy in Honiara will play a big role in facilitating this engagement process.

In the short to medium term, traditional powers and other Pacific island countries will watch closely whether China will seek to build a military base in Solomon Islands. The U.S. government has warned that they will “respond accordingly” if this occurs. The Australian government refers to such a base establishment as a red line. No doubt, a Chinese military base in Solomon Islands will greatly increase China’s military projection power in a region regarded by traditional powers as their sphere of influence. It will exacerbate the existing geostrategic tensions between China and traditional powers, and further split the Pacific region. By then, it is likely that Pacific island countries may have to take sides.

This post was edited by ferdia on May 5 2022 12:31pm
Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
May 5 2022 12:29pm
yes.
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 5 2022 12:30pm
David's son islands
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 5 2022 12:31pm
No. The US should mind its own fucking business.
Member
Posts: 56,415
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 579,503.02
May 5 2022 12:32pm
Recommend before voting to read up on the issues not just for the region but also for China vis a vi Australia and US | Australia relations (if you dont know already).

Quote (Santara @ May 5 2022 07:31pm)
No. The US should mind its own fucking business.


The US would consider this their business ( I am not voting yet, i was simply asked to make the topic and to add - from a US standpoint this is a critical area of their foreign policy, i.e. China ).

This post was edited by ferdia on May 5 2022 12:34pm
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
May 5 2022 12:34pm
The people of the solomon islands have the right to pursue their own interests. In an ideal world the usa should mind its own business. In the current political climate it would be wise for the usa to invade.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 5 2022 12:38pm
Quote (Santara @ May 5 2022 01:31pm)
No. The US should mind its own fucking business.


China's business is America's business. Checkmate libertarian
Member
Posts: 47,129
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 5 2022 12:39pm
Quote (Santara @ May 5 2022 11:31am)
No. The US should mind its own fucking business.


Quote (duffman316 @ May 5 2022 11:34am)
The people of the solomon islands have the right to pursue their own interests. In an ideal world the usa should mind its own business. In the current political climate it would be wise for the usa to invade.


Quote (thesnipa @ May 5 2022 11:30am)
David's son islands


trump disagrees with you
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
May 5 2022 12:39pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ May 5 2022 11:38am)
China's business is America's business.


What
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 5 2022 12:39pm
Quote (TiStuff @ May 5 2022 01:39pm)
trump disagrees with you


He lost so his opinion is irrelevant.

Get rekt
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12313Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll