People are receiving offers to spread false information about the vaccines. Looks like another project veritas sting though i dont know what the european lead peddler of lies is called. I wonder how successful the disinformation campaign has been 🤔

"Some European influencers say they received an offer to post false information about COVID-19 vaccines from a mysterious company, according to multiple reports" https://twitter.com/i/events/1397281219797164035?s=09

Jimmy o'queef can suck my veritass

Covid killed my grandma

RIP Gma



Okay pay up.

80% of the world will do anything the Gov ask them no question asked. I still live the same and didn't get a vaxx nor anyone i know. We all healthy and doing good. Your whole country is overweight, don't force people to do something because of your laziness.

It's like forcing the whole world to give away their weapons because you guys are addicted to public shootings.

What's funny is that most who try to convince the mass to get the vaccine are overweight or smokers or simply people with bad life habits.

Cringe AF.

80% don't need convincing by anyone and 80% is neither obese nor smokers. If anything id wager the anti-vax group is significantly more likely to be smokers. Id say a high % of the anti-vax community on JSP either has weed signatures, avatars or weed related statuses indicating they likely at least smoke something.


Relative to never and former smokers, current smokers reported significantly greater mistrust of vaccine benefit, were more worried about unforeseen future effects, had greater concerns about commercial profiteering, and had a stronger preference for natural immunity (Badjs 0.16–0.36, p < .001). Current smokers were more likely to be uncertain (27.6% vs. 22.7% of never smokers, RRadj 1.43 [95% confidence interval = 1.31–1.56]; vs. 19.3% of former smokers, RRadj 1.55 [1.41–1.73]) or unwilling (21.5% vs. 11.6% of never smokers, RRadj 2.12 [1.91–2.34]; vs. 14.7% of former smokers, RRadj 1.53 [1.37–1.71]) to receive a Covid-19 vaccine.

https://academic.oup.com/ntr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ntr/ntab039/6159686


This post was edited by SBD on May 26 2021 03:13pm

The anti-vaccine movement has never had a leg to stand on. Ever. There is no basis of information to be interpreted differently, there is no evidence that you could maybe stretch into saying something. There is nothing. When you start from absolutely nothing all you have is misinformation. It's a fundamentally dishonest movement.

its not a vaccine. calling it a vaccine is dishonest. changing the definition of vaccine to include it is dishonest.

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 26 2021 03:48pm

If you google "vaccine definition" you get

vac·cine
/vakˈsēn/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.

Under this definition it is absolutely a vaccine.



What definition are you using?

Hours before tistuff says anything you can usually find a new YouTube video or tictoc about it.

He has no explanation as to what he means unless he’s been told the reasoning. He’s a literal bot.

"Vaccine" Definition Changed Suddenly By Webster Dictionary To Include Controversial mRNA Shots
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ttaM67tfeBBZ/

you didnt provide the full definition
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vaccine

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 26 2021 04:02pm