Most people have made up their minds as to what they believe in.
If we go back a few hundred years, let's say back to the days of Newton, people would still explain the laws of the universe to be governed by God. Newton said that the invisible hand of God would make the planets stable in their orbit around the Sun.
Today we have some pretty good equations that explains these stuff without the need of God to be directly involved as far as we know.
When Napoleon asked Pierre-Simon Laplace why there was no mention of God in his book on the system of the universe Laplace replied, Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là. ("I had no need of that hypothesis.").
The Catholic Church declared war on free thinkers and science back in the dark ages - which did a pretty big harm to the belief in God all the way up to this day.
Science continues in their mission to explain the universe and origin of life without the mentioning of God.
There's a couple different hypothesis to how the universe came into existence out of nothing. Everything is believed to be random and lucky coincidences that even let to the universe being able to experience itself by creating life and human beings with a highly (evolved) consciousness. But the idea that matter as we know it came into existence out of nothing is even more illogical than if it was God who created everything.
Nothing can't create something. The sort of energy that quarks etc. are made of must have come from a different source than we know of. Life itself, DNA, RNA, amino acids, and the whole way cells works together and communicate... How can you be so convinced that information like DNA has evolved by itself?
Right now in the way the system is we're isolating ourselves and we treat other people like they are not even human beings. Because peoples conciousness has been toxicated for so long and live by their primitive senses and not the once that make them unique and human.
People even laugh about the idea of a creator even though it sounds even more possible than the scientific explanations. Science leads nowhere in a direction of hope where as belief leads directly to the source of all hope.
My take on this is that only through Jesus Christ are we saved from this world and from spending an eternity away from the presence of God. That might sound unfair to someone who is not believing but it's something that you choose by your own free will. There's even a bunch of prophecies about the coming of Jesus hundreds of years before he was born:
Quote
Isaiah 53:3–7
“He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.”
But if prophecies, the idea that something can't come from nothing but has to be created by something bigger than us, and the idea that life can't evolve by itself into complex life, and probably countless of more reasons then let's have a debate.
So what is your stance towards all of this and what are your explanations?