http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=9T5vHi-WrMk#t=223s

"Sexual antagonism hypothesis".

Basically, the same trait that causes men to be attracted to other malesl may exist in the female members of that family, causing likewise an even stronger urge to have sex with males, granting a possible genetic advantage.

New studies have shown that it indeed does offer a greater rate of reproduction.

Homosexuality is a choice and a sin. Science takes just as much faith as the bible, except the bible is true.

Whether sarcasm or honesty, I would appreciate less spam in my thread, thank you.

That would be plausible for explaining bisexual men, but homosexual? It misses the other half of the problem.

Which is?

Imho:

Bisexuality is more of a choice than homosexuality. People choose to not be bothered by sexual doings with members of the same sex and engage in such activity for the sake of heightened pleasure.

As for the OP:

Do you have any other sources for this?

A homosexual is:
Attracted to men.
Not attracted to women.

This only addresses the first part.

Sarcasm. I figured I should get that part of the discussion over with in post #2 instead of watching a 3 page discussion over the same thing.

Wat? That's the whole point of the problem and what the hypothesis tries to solve.



Lol. Thanks.

No, I just found it. I'll look in a bit.

I just don't get what the actual problem is with homosexuality. Nobody makes anybody else be gay. It doesn't really effect anybody else...

I really just don't see what the problem is, when it comes to legality.