Okay, serious question here:
If Charlie Kirk's ideas were so dangerous that some people celebrated his death, does that mean free speech only matters for opinions we like? If your answer is "his speech caused harm," who gets to decide which political opinions are harmful enough to justify silencing? Curious where people draw the line.
We live in a day and age where people celebrate the death of someone with a different opinion and that death was celebrated by people supporting the very things that lead towards this level of mental illness.
Charlie Kirk did no wrong by having genuine discussion with ideas and was a good man and on the other side of that evil celebration we have celebration in Heaven where Charlie is now.
This thread is simply going to include nothing but laughing emojis and no real discussion from the left leaning individuals in this section. They will continue remaining part of the problem. The moment you feel it is okay to murder just because you speak freely with people who freely choose to pick up a microphone to have open discussion is an extreme level of evil. It's those actions that continue to show how important Jesus is.