he cut out an image and used it. how is that agginst the rules?

but that isn't aggisnt the rules. He cut out 2 images from 2 sigs and used them together. If this was agginst the rules then nobody could ever have the same image in a sig ever.

he took the entire thing... that is ripping. if u look @ the sig, he did not use just that 1 part, he used the entire thing including the buildings which is ripping


thats not how people make sigs... they dont take other peoples sigs that people worked on and copy them. they have to actually make them.. how do u think the images get made in the first place?

This post was edited by Rscaper101 on Jul 13 2011 08:11pm

yes it did look like he ripped but those 2 images he didn't I could make a sig with 1 render only and then when someone uses that render I make them banned cause they stole my sig.

1st off thats not the case, u dont understand what ripping is then or what he is ripping i guess. but lets drop that. back to the original post. look @ those. there is solid proof that he took the SAME EXACT signature and just added a name. He made absoultely no other changes!

idk how that site works but you used a 1k by 1k size picture or w/e to search.

but lets drop that

i am saying he is a ripper. Just didn't rip those last 2. That is still like 10 images ripped from what I saw, and that is enough imo to lock / scammer tag / w.e happens to rippers.

nothing happens to them =/

wtf really?

well i hope he doesn't scam anyone ever again. I doubt he will show his face here for a while.

Scam of what?

The sig in the ripper accusation haven't been sold.

Do you think i would try to scam 500 fg's for fun? When i have 10k fg's?

This post was edited by Archive on Jul 13 2011 08:26pm

you probally sold ripped sigs for that fg

sorry I ment to say, I hope nobody buys your ripped sigs.

This post was edited by Wajawu on Jul 13 2011 08:27pm