vectoring isnt realy hard qq, polishing the vector is harder

this was my first(and only)

[img]http://i38.tinypic.com/11sz910.jpg[/img]

shitty i know no colors

Just like Whyte said. Your vector may have "loads of transitions" and "lots of detail" or WHATEVER you want to say about it. But it still doesn't LOOK GOOD.

If your talking about mine i dont think it looks good. What vectors are you talking about?

Any vectors in general. Yours is an example.

Nobody in this thread can actually vector very well.

What the hell? you're making no sense, mine doesnt have loads of transitions and colors, but it doesnt look good. So what you said on post 9904 doesnt apply here.



This applies here.


http://ddsoul.deviantart.com/art/Allaya-Vector-in-Color-26582348

loads of transitions and colors- looks good.

This post was edited by Newspaper on Aug 7 2008 02:05pm

some do imo, but i find vectoring is marely a stage in a process of a photographic reproduction or cartoon like image, made as a fictional ummm thing. lol

you know what i mean >_<

becides vexels are more fun



levis gtfo your high horse, i want a ride

This post was edited by WhyteLinux on Aug 7 2008 02:05pm

It has a lot of "detail" which is what I'm saying. The problem is people think that the more "transitions" you have, the better the vector is. It's not true.

Knowing how much is enough makes it look a thousand times better than adding too much.

Anyone can add a BILLION shades of color into each piece, but it's not gonna make it look good.