your clan leader suggested that either you made the sig or you gave your friend a copy of my sig to further edit. either way, you're at fault for the ripping of my sig.

and as for the adobe PS bull, obviously i'm aware acrobat leader is categorized under adobe. i doubted photoshop was even in there anyways, but such an uneducated attempt at proving you don't have photoshop urged me to post that.

1. you could've uninstalled PS 5 minutes before
2. you could've renamed photoshop's folder
3. photoshop could've still been categorized under adobe

lol as i have explained i told my friend to find her own picture and do whatever and surprise me with a good signature. therefore i am not at fault.
why would i waste time uninstalling a program that would take me hours to get back cuz im on dial-up lol... ill open up the adobe thing and prove to u that PS
is not categorized underneath of it. seriously as i have said before if i had PS and i did rip peoples sigs dont u think i woulda picked a better sig to rip from?
and be careful not to post anywhere that the person i ripped the sig from would find me? seriously i may be stupid sometimes but im not that stupid...

First of All, this isn't concidered spam. We have in debate over whether the sig you have shown "evidence" of being ripped is true or not. That is what this thread is about.

As far as WaSmack being on your side, SHE is not on your side, nor is she on Sesshy's side... she is only trying to get to the bottom of this whole situation so HER guild doesn't see any shame from this.

As far you going through "advanced" .psd editing.... there is nothing advanced about you did to that image at all. It is a very simple 10-15 edit, if that. And the reasoning could be any number of things.... just because you don't know someone on jsp doesn't mean you aren't a trouble maker who likes to stir up problems.

My reasoning for posting in this topic was to help Sesshy with evidence that puts doubt in your story, because he would have no clue how to do it himself and I would hate to see him locked for something as stupid as this.

Your .psd file has a background, edited from the stock image, and the angel itself... that is it. And if you put that image up on photobucket or imageshack at any point in time, it becomes public property that anyone can take. If you did in fact make this image when you said you did, there is nothing that says the person that made Sesshy's sig didn't see it on imageshack/photobucket and decide to use that as the stock image for the sig that he/she used for Sesshy's sig. Ur image is too basic to call it ripping though, If that was the case, it would be like someone reporting you for using the stock image I provided as evidence that you ripped the original artist's work, and they should sue you for it.

two walls of text i'm not going to read in this topic



(that means to PM me if you have anything important to say)

This post was edited by lagunalight on Sep 3 2008 08:19pm

DUMBASS

again, LOOK AT THE LAYERS PALLETE. half of the layers are hidden to prove that i didn't just add a bunch of layers on 0% opacity and call the sig my own .psd

and quit insulting my work. it was a rough draft for a signature request, to see if the guy liked it.

This post was edited by lagunalight on Sep 3 2008 08:21pm

To provide real evidence, take an s/s of each layer added on. To me, all your layers look like a bunch of randomness.

edit: for you to say you aren't going to read what someone has posted in defense of the accused, shows real ignorance on your behalf btw.

This post was edited by DragonWisdom on Sep 3 2008 08:25pm

PM me if you want me to try and convince you some more, no more posting proof-less posts in this topic.

edit: at your ignorancy comment.

idgaf as to what you have to say. i know i've been ripped, i've provided evidence for it and any un-biased opinions will agree with me. and unless you can prove otherwise your words are useless to me. hence your wasted time.


now PM me if you're going to respond.

This post was edited by lagunalight on Sep 3 2008 08:27pm

whatever dude. i ripped ur signature. i have no programs and no knowledge of how to make signatures well but i ripped it. k? end of discussion. lock me up idgaf anymore.
i tried explaining everything to u but ur gonna be a fucking prick about it and wont accept my apology. i coulda been a complete fucking asshole and ignored u and kept the sig on.
but no, u claimed it as urs so i apologised, explained wat happened, AND changed my signature to prevent an argument. but no ur a fucking little prick who is only worried about bitching
and trying to prove everyone wrong.

It was unintentional "rip" seeing as i didnt make the sig. my friend did it for me. whether u bleieve that or not its ur choice.

This post was edited by Sesshy9454 on Sep 3 2008 08:31pm

kthx.
you're sorta forgiven.

idc if you forgive me or not. i know the truth and whether u choose to believe it or not thats ur choice.