d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Lwe12345's Progression Thread > Looking For Constructive Criticism
Prev12345623Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 27,294
Joined: May 4 2008
Gold: 3,982.00
Oct 16 2012 01:15pm
Quote (Lwe12345 @ Oct 16 2012 08:12pm)
http://i.imgur.com/Xq9Tw.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Xcc60.jpg


Blurry render
Bad typo
Boring composition
kinda bad blended aswell imo
Member
Posts: 8,783
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 14,555.15
Oct 16 2012 02:41pm
Quote (SHAD0W @ Oct 16 2012 03:15pm)
Blurry render
Bad typo
Boring composition
kinda bad blended aswell imo


see here's the constructive part we're all missing, if I were you and I were trying to be remotely helpful I would say something like :
The render looks blurry. If I were you I'd only download renders that are very high resolution and look clear
The type doesn't seem to match the feel of the sig. I'd try something a little more Gothic
The composition doesn't seem too exciting. Try *insert helpful suggestion here*
Also how did you blend the render in? It doesn't seem natural. Try *insert helpful suggestion*


But that's just if 1% of me wanted to be even just a minuscule amount of help.

I guess we all have different views of what is constructive, though I didn't know that it was a word open to such a vast array of interpretations


may I add that I started this shit like a month ago, and this is my first signature using those techniques


This post was edited by Lwe12345 on Oct 16 2012 02:43pm
Member
Posts: 33,012
Joined: Jan 21 2008
Gold: 120.00
Oct 16 2012 02:45pm
Quote (Lwe12345 @ Oct 16 2012 02:41pm)
see here's the constructive part we're all missing, if I were you and I were trying to be remotely helpful I would say something like :
The render looks blurry. If I were you I'd only download renders that are very high resolution and look clear
The type doesn't seem to match the feel of the sig. I'd try something a little more Gothic
The composition doesn't seem too exciting. Try *insert helpful suggestion here*
Also how did you blend the render in? It doesn't seem natural. Try *insert helpful suggestion*


But that's just if 1% of me wanted to be even just a minuscule amount of help.

I guess we all have different views of what is constructive, though I didn't know that it was a word open to such a vast array of interpretations


may I add that I started this shit like a month ago, and this is my first signature using those techniques


calm down
Member
Posts: 8,783
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 14,555.15
Oct 16 2012 02:55pm
Quote (UncleMuscles @ Oct 16 2012 04:45pm)
calm down


bye
Member
Posts: 1,425
Joined: Nov 22 2002
Gold: 700.00
Oct 16 2012 06:34pm
Quote (NumberOneSnake @ Oct 16 2012 07:00pm)
You got really good O_O Good work



B)
Member
Posts: 8,783
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 14,555.15
Oct 16 2012 07:27pm
So does anyone have any actually helpful things to say about the most recent sig i've done? I'd love to make it better but at this point it's the best I've done to date and I need some pointers on it.
Member
Posts: 17,750
Joined: Jul 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Oct 16 2012 07:56pm
Quote (Lwe12345 @ Oct 16 2012 03:41pm)
see here's the constructive part we're all missing, if I were you and I were trying to be remotely helpful I would say something like :
The render looks blurry. If I were you I'd only download renders that are very high resolution and look clear
The type doesn't seem to match the feel of the sig. I'd try something a little more Gothic
The composition doesn't seem too exciting. Try *insert helpful suggestion here*
Also how did you blend the render in? It doesn't seem natural. Try *insert helpful suggestion*


But that's just if 1% of me wanted to be even just a minuscule amount of help.

I guess we all have different views of what is constructive, though I didn't know that it was a word open to such a vast array of interpretations


may I add that I started this shit like a month ago, and this is my first signature using those techniques


No one can just tell you here this will make something being great, they can tell you what to keep an eye out for next time.
Member
Posts: 23,897
Joined: Mar 4 2008
Gold: 535.00
Oct 16 2012 08:51pm
Basic run down on a couple of things you're doing wrong in 99% of these sigs:


Colours are way too saturated.
Stay the fuck away from animation. It never looks good.
Stay away from the requests forum, people there have no idea what they're talking about and what (artistically) looks good.
Stay away from popouts (borderless).
Use better stocks that are sharper, have better composition.


Read these.
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=57874419&f=246
Member
Posts: 4,405
Joined: Nov 18 2009
Gold: 1.36
Oct 16 2012 09:42pm
Quote (Lwe12345 @ Oct 9 2012 11:33pm)
I see why that could be more helpful
Things I currently want to figure more out about are clipping masks, making smudge sigs look good, and integrating some really nice blending using shapes and effects. I honestly don't even know how the person achieved this :
http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/290/4/a/game_of_thrones_signature_by_spyrde-d4d40zf.png
But I'd love to find out.
I think the part of doing popouts that has helped me has been finding out what shapes look good with the characters. It's a way to try not to over complicate and clutter the signature, and just try to find a shape that compliments the character inside. It's actually helped with my square signatures because I have a good concept of when it's too noisy and when I should scale it back a bit.
Do you suggest just using microsoft default fonts?
I have more work to post. Here are the next two!

http://i.imgur.com/URpNu.jpg
- Completely from scratch, using textures shapes and effects. SOLD to Solicit for a guild banner.



http://i.imgur.com/D8er1.jpg
- Attempt at Temple Jax


ty free sig men
Member
Posts: 48,531
Joined: Oct 15 2007
Gold: 100.00
Oct 17 2012 12:32am
Quote (Lwe12345 @ 16 Oct 2012 23:41)
see here's the constructive part we're all missing, if I were you and I were trying to be remotely helpful I would say something like :
The render looks blurry. If I were you I'd only download renders that are very high resolution and look clear
The type doesn't seem to match the feel of the sig. I'd try something a little more Gothic
The composition doesn't seem too exciting. Try *insert helpful suggestion here*
Also how did you blend the render in? It doesn't seem natural. Try *insert helpful suggestion*



But that's just if 1% of me wanted to be even just a minuscule amount of help.

I guess we all have different views of what is constructive, though I didn't know that it was a word open to such a vast array of interpretations


may I add that I started this shit like a month ago, and this is my first signature using those techniques


Firstly, how is the part where you suggest downloading high quality renders constructive? Being said that render is blurry and quality sucks donkeys c*ck, i find it obvious that you do not download any more of low quality renders/stocks. Why waste time to type something simple in more complicated way? It is not needed.

Secondly, people are not here to spoon-feed everyone that jumps in. You can learn typography by browsing web for tutorials. Why would anyone tell you what fits your piece? You are the producer, you decide. Whenever you ask for opinions or criticism, people will come and tell you how they see something and what is turning them off. Not to tell you how you should work but which parts you could and should improve. Learning is up to you.

Learn composition. Search for tutorials about blending, colors, depth, rule-of-3rds. They are all available for you if you just took 2 seconds to look for them. Hobo's thread is up and there are many useful tutorials, all organized for easy finding. Don't be lazy, you got to work for what you want.

I hope that brings some sense to you. Don't expect others to do the work for you, work hard yourself and better results will come in time.
Go Back To Graphic Design Topic List
Prev12345623Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll