Quote (_Mork_ @ Wed, 3 Dec 2008, 06:49)
Quote (Lithic @ Wed, 3 Dec 2008, 16:46)
Quote (_Mork_ @ Wed, 3 Dec 2008, 06:41)
Quote (Lithic @ Wed, 3 Dec 2008, 16:06)
Since Balakai is going to be very inactive for the next week who am I supposed to message about a warn I think is unfair.
Just wait for him to come back and get to it?
Well
cos of you there was porn images in forums
so it is your fault
it is totally unrelevant was he wearing your sig illegaly or not
it wont give you right to spread porn in the forums
if you would had pm me i would had removed the stolen sig instantly
I never forced him to use the links.
I never posted actual porn, just the actual images.
Would it be my fault if I uploaded porn to my PB and someone used it as a signature? No, it wouldn't.
you knew that had those links like you explained in that topic in the warn log
so the warn you got was rightful 100% since it was YOUR fault that there was porn images shoving on the forum
So I get a warn for posting porn when I never actually posted it, somebody else did?
Yes it was my fault, but it also says no where on any of the User Groups pages to PM any of you about a ripped sig.
There is a ripper accusation topic, yes, and it is also pretty much useless. You can go through and month old ripper accusations still haven't been dealt with. The actual forum rules say nothing about ripping signatures being illegal so it doesn't appear to be a "Major Violation" which I would only constitute to be keyloggers and anything notably harmful.
I did everything to my ability to keep it from getting spread out like someone actually posting it would.
I sent him a PM beforehand as well as after.
I changed the images back to what they were immediately after he made a post. Which was maybe 5 minutes after I had changed them.
It would make more sense to me if the reason behind it was something else, not saying that I posted something that I didn't.
i remove and warn signature rippers everyday.. and 90% of them are from the ripper topic..