Quote (Xandriia @ Jan 5 2017 02:19pm)
I normally don't bother commenting on these but why not?
You both seem kind of douchebaggy but putting that aside, let's talk about the tags.
There is really nothing to this bread's. Boxes + space stock + drop shadow + animation = 5 minutes tops.
At least the other tag looks like someone attempted to put effort into it. There was some attempt at using rule of thirds, trying to blend the render into the tag, flow is wonky and the smudge is as basic as it gets..but still, there's effort.
This isn't saying that simple or quick tags aren't good. But you shouldn't be able to dissect a tag completely and know that it took less than five minutes.
There, someone from the forum responded, now you guys can take the pissing contest elsewhere.
lol I don't mind its kinda funny.
Breads is terrible. Plain and simple. In a graphic standpoint its everything you should not do. All its missing is bleeding cowboy's and layer of topaz so thick that it looks like it were painted with a 90px hard round.
Argells needs work. its not a great signature, but there is some knowledge of graphic design put into it. Good or Bad it automatically wins.
The people voting for the other signature have signatures that are even worse. So yeah.
If its a popout and it didnt come from Phil it should be illegal on this forum.
This post was edited by DB_odin on Jan 5 2017 04:40pm