Quote (CHurley @ May 11 2013 12:43pm)
Here you go brah, I'm guessing this is what you came for;
Your paintings are simply magnificent. The colors, what can I say? Harmonious, balanced, symphonic. The brushwork is simple, elegant, and rhythmical, which only serves to echo the melodious tone and values you portray euphonically. Why the musical metaphors? Because these paintings transcend the mere confinements of visual art; pulverizing the barriers separating them from other art forms, these pieces echo what centuries of artists, musicians, dancers, and writers have pursued - self actualization. These unfinished pieces might be hailed as 'lazy' to the layman, but it is clear that in your minimalism, you have become acquainted with the true meaning of aesthetics in nature - transcending that even of the late God of Olympus himself Zyzz. You have crossed the boundaries of Elysium and embodied the nature of man in your art; perhaps the concept of nirvana may not be found in ancient religion or rituals, but between the glory and wonder of ease's brushstrokes. In 1870, the Mona Lisa was displayed in the Louvre, Paris; perhaps after a near century and a half, it shall be unhung and replaced with an Ease.
you could be a great art critic or poet, though trust me, i don't think my work deserves more than a glance most of the time. if anyone here actually understood the watercolor medium and could suggest specific ways in which i could work the paint to achieve a higher quality product i'd be happy to listen. what did i hear from you though? something about being of high school standard? im sure some high schoolers spend plenty of time painting and have become as good as the best watercolorists out there, so who cares about such a remark? it's not constructive in the least bit to hear.