I take it as your brain capacity doesn't reach the required level to respond with anything more reasonable than a retarded yellow head rolling on one and another side. I imagine as if you are referring to your emotion or action caused by my post, you are a lot like the stupid thing in your reply.

photoshop's primary function is to edit raster images.. if you need to do some type, layout and vectoring, then you bring the image into illustrator. comparing the two is pointless, considering they're suppose to be used together.

I have marked a part of your comment in red, and that is my reaction.

clueless

Proove me that illustrator is not even half as flexible as photoshop.

This post was edited by SHAD0W on Oct 4 2012 12:37pm

trolol..

As said, they are different programs for different things. As eric said, you cannot compare them because of their different purpose. Photoshop is mean for all-in-one tool. You can do everything with it what you would except from it. Illustrator isn't in comparison because it isn't meant for that. Also is true that they are meant to work together not separately.

So, whatever you brought out in my post and made you laugh, elaborate why and prove me wrong.

Until you do so, hold back from posting anything in nearest future.