Quote (Slunko @ Jun 8 2011 02:48pm)
no, i was in fact trolling you as name implies they are made in C4d (cinema 4D).<-- the name of the program they are made in.
Since you are new we won't get offensive as we usually get when someone start saying sigs are simple and it's just bunch of stuff thrown together, since it all goes a bit beyond that. We take siknatchur buiss pretty serious here, thought i should also mention that.
If your goal s to do requests, than you will be mashing bunch of random stuff together, such as c4ds, sloppy renders, effects, default filters etc. IF you decide to actually go beyond that, than you might have a chance here at gfx general.
best of luck with c4ds, and i didn't mean to be offensive!
Oh I stand by what I said. Most signatures are relatively simple to create. However the good ones are worthy of respect... and I'm sure there are tons of people here who make good sigs. What I'm saying is there is a large number of sig creators who make simplistic crap. Maybe I'm wrong on the numbers; all I'm saying is that I've seen a lot of simplistic sigs which are basically a C4D over/underlapping with fading effects, and a couple effects thrown in, text, and voila. No disrespect to those who actually make well-designed nice sigs... I do recognize that. Hopefully that clarifies my standpoint.
I am definitely dedicated to learning photoshop, tablet art, sig-making, and general digital design. I do intend to be one of the more serious people around here. So you likely won't be hearing me make such connotative remarks in the future.
Thanks for the words, and clarification of the trolling